What is the Universal Principle/Beginning of Knowledge? Segue to Cosmovision.
Objective: To Startup the Originary Sign Cosmovision Era of Peace. To that effect, please form cells in your neighborhoods to further the cause/movement.
Caveat: The content of this application relies solely on conclusions and assumes familiarity with the theory condensed found at the website www.paradisism.com, based in turn on my books at Amazon.
If you’re a school teacher or college professor, pastor or priest, and master your specific subject matter, then the general question of What is the Universal Principle/Beginning of Knowledge is meant for you.
You should know it, confess you disregard it, or else don’t know what it is. The University is a relic in name but not in concept. After all, the meaning underlying the name of University as uni-verse is “turning into one” as in Uni-S / Verse-DRP of the PaRaDi/Se formula. It makes perfect sense since all knowledge subjects taught in Academia rely on principles, then certainly there’s a universal principle/beginning of knowledge underlying them all.
Today people prefer concrete solutions to concrete problems with analysis providing the toolbox instead of a universal principle. Spoiler alert. The Universal Principle/Beginning of Knowledge (UP/BK) is the PaRaDi/Se formula of the Originary Sign Cosmovision (OSC).
So, let’s take it from the top and work our way downwards. Let’s not throw the baby out with the bathwater. The universal principle of knowledge (UPK) is the same as the universal beginning of knowledge (UBK) as UP/BK! This takes us to the cradle of cradles of humanity in the form of the Postulate of the Originary Sign Cosmovision and the resulting OSC residue in the epoch of anarchy and in the originary civilizations. The virtue of this cornerstone assumption lies in laying the conceptual framework as well as opening the field of applications of the theory.
What this means in practice is placing the advent of humanity in an Epoch of Anarchy after that of hunter-gathering and before civilization proper. The character of this Epoch of Anarchy is nothing other than the Originary Sign Cosmovision which thePaRaDi/Se formulaprovides. This OSC refers to the view of anarchy as self-rule, or autonomy, over the terravision relationship of other-rule, or heteronomy, or ruler-ruled of civilization. In formula, uni/triadism of the coming Age is Anarchy-S / Cosmovision-DRP, as compared to mono-dualism of what we endure today of Civilization-S / Terravision-DRP, broken into Theology-D Philosophy-R Science-P.
The timeline unravelling the riddle was a back-&-forth movement between the originary civilizations and one of its derivatives. For economy we’ll express this with the help of the PaRaDi/Se formula. That is, on the one hand, between 1st Derivative Israel synthesized out of Mesopotamia and Egypt consisting of the twice removed OSC residue of Alef / BeReshIth A / InBeginningOf (א/בְּ-רֵאשִׁ֖-ית) as A-S / In-D Beginning-R Of-P, and on the other hand, of the OSC residue of Mesoamerica with Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli Flower Song / Life as Flower-P (space)-R Song-D / Life-S.
The point is that what saved the day was that without the OSC residue of Mesoamerica, Israel’s twice removed OSC residue 1st Derivative ofA / InBeginningOf wouldn’t have been authenticated. Likewise, without Israel’s twice removed OSC residue, Mesoamerica’s OSC residue of Flower Song / Life wouldn’t have been identified. Now that we finally got it right, the challenge moving forward towards a world of peace and wholeness is the PaRaDi/Se formula of the Universal Principle/Beginning of Knowledge (UP/BK) as per the Originary Sign Cosmovision (OSC). In a nutshell, the recipe of the Margarita cosmovision cocktail is Israel’s primeval kabbalah, Mesoamerica’s Toltecáyotl, and Greece’s logos, all in Kabbayotlogy. QED
Caveat: This is a historic manuscript on hope as peace of revealed creative activity and discovered active creativity. For general readership, please consider understanding “CBI” as placeholder for your congregation or community, and “Jewish” as placeholder for your faith or beliefs, values or interests, and so on.
It’s partly based on my latest book found at Amazon of “The Alef/BeReshIth Xóchitl CuícatlPaRaDi/Se Principle” (June 2025), in English & Spanish. FREE eBook on 1st, 15th of the month.
I’m pleased to advent the Cosmovision Age of Peace! You’re invited to celebrate, integrate and kindle the cause/movement ripple of the Originary Sign Cosmovision (OSC) of the PaRaDi/Se Principle for the III Millennium. www.paradisism.com.
~
January 17, 2026
67 pages, by Ricardo Turullols-Bonilla
The Cosmovision Age of Peace!
(On anarchy & civilization of the Originary Sign cosmovision of the PaRaDi/Se principle of Mexoamerica’s humanism &-\ Israel’s theism)
~
The genesis of things is at the cradle of cradles by kindling the Originary Sign Cosmovision.
What is the cause of antisemitism and how to supersede it? At the cornerstone of hatred is antisemitism, and only replacing it with cosmovision will bring about peace to the world and harmony in the universe.
Instead of fighting antisemitism & injustice, strive for recovering & applying the originary sign cosmovision of the PaRaDi/Se principle of Israel’s theism &-/ Mesoamerica’s humanism. The OSC answer is a long shot, but with stakes so high, it’s very well worth trying.
No pain no gain. This essay is not for the faint of heart.
Newton rescued knowledge from natural philosophy unto mathematical philosophy of physics, with mathematics the language of nature. But then what is the abstract language of culture? Or better still, is there a single language of nature and culture? Our postulate is the PaRaDi/Se Principle of the Cosmovision of the Originary Sign!
And the earth was … and the wind of Elohim hovered over the face of the waters: Genesis 1:2
~
I believe the Torah was divinely inspired and that it’s an unfoldment of the PaRaDi/Se Principle of the Originary Sign Cosmovision (OSC).
~
One needs to know where one’s coming from to know where one is and where one’s going to. The peace of the Originary Testament (OT) stems from the Originary Sign Cosmovision (OSC).
~
The established approach to our future will fail unless we partner with an entirely new one founded on the originary cradle of humanity and which translates into consensual concrete actions and policies.
~
There’s a need of putting a premium on causation and less fixation on effects. The purpose of being human isn’t excelling, sex-&-success, but creatively activating life. As Kohelet put it: happiness is futile, solely creative activity is fruitful.
What ever happened to the OSC? That’s the not even posed question in modern times, much like a lack of awareness of our loss. It assimilated the success imperative of the West and in the process disintegrated the World. But what proof is there that the purpose of existence is excelling over our peers. In the big, bigger and biggest picture view of things, it hardly matters who’s on top. Perhaps it’s giving back life as we were given it by the Creator by being creative creatures of creation.
~
The big picture, the bigger point of view, & the biggest Cosmovision. Only with the biggest is there nowhere to hide. It provides an abstracted view of things through the PaRaDi/Se Universal Principle of Knowledge (UPK). Without the cosmovision you end up as a sailboat, at the mercy of which way the wind blows, the currents flow, and the output of oarsmen. The choice is between cosmovision or casuistry of back-&-forth between right-&-left positions according to the balance of forces in context. No wonder all politicians without compass break their promises when faced with pressing reality. Solely the Originary Sign cosmovision can provide self-power.
~
To resolve the incongruence of state and society, one has to go to its cradle. The cradle of the West isn’t the cradle of the World. The cradle of the West is Greece-as-State and secondarily Israel-as-Church, meaning Israel for faith and Greece for pretty much everything else. But the cradle of the World is actually Mesoamerica-&-Israel as the Originary Sign Cosmovision (OSC) of the PaRaDi/Se Principle!
~
The principle of complementarity is between Mesoamerica’s humanism and Israel’s theism. Both are faith peoples traditions which have kept alive the OSC, each in its own unique manner.
~
The originary civilizations of East and West, along the long route, are joined/separated by the Interstice of the Americas, much like a coin whose sides are both joined and separated at the rim. Each set is consort in that if one loses the OSC, the other loses it. But if one conserves it, the other may lose or conserve it. East and West lost it, Mesoamerica conserved it, with Andean as yet unknown. This is related to the identical twins separated at birth. Is it nurture or nature?
~
Today’s crisis springs from the myth that the cradle of the West is the cradle of the World. It is not by thousands of years. Well, how so and which is what? In following we’ll try to break it down into what it is and what it means for us all in theory and applications.
~
Israel as S/DRP is God-S worship-/-obedience Human-DRP, Pray-D Obey-R Circumcise-P.
Mesoamerica as PRD/S is Human-PRD, Contemplate-P Meditate-R Praise-P creature-/-creative Life-S.
The Creator-S of creative-/-creature of Creation-DRP, of Spiritual-D Mental-R Physical-P.
~
Mesoamerica validates Israel as 1st Derivative of the OSC of the civilizations of Egypt-&-Mesopotamia, all the while Israel acknowledges Mesoamerica as the live OSC residue.
~
Give innovative ideas the benefit of the doubt till proven right or wrong by first studying it. The joy of giving change a chance to succeed. Good things take time to bring about.
~
Ensuing is the Originary Sign Cosmovision (OSC). For quick reference to be clarified later on, holism is uni/triadism with OS-S / Cosmovision-DRP, Religion-D Philosophy-R Science-P.
The author is a science teacher not a scholar, who asks questions which others don’t.
~
The title of “The Cosmovision Age of Peace” as CBI’s Ripple of Peace alludes to the theory of the Big Bang of the Universe. Actually, more like a butterfly ripple as it flaps its wings over a pond. The evolution of the title went from the Age of Peace to the Cosmovision Age of Peace by way of peace as shalom, then shalem, then wholeness, then universe, and finally cosmovision. In any case, Cosmovision chimes better with Enlightenment than with Peace on its own.
~
The consultant set the tone, the president the goals, the author the means to achieve them, and together makes the foundational document of the Cosmovision Age of Peace.
~
This small essay is a big tent. If you can’t beat them, lead them!
~
Progress tends towards corruption if it’s missing the OSC of the PaRaDi/Se Principle.
~
Kabbayotlogy as S/DRP and PRD/S is the abstract language of culture of the PaRaDi/Se Principle.
Before we begin let’s prestart with the a, b, c and 1, 2, 3. What is a concept? Let’s start from the bottom and work our way upward.
Mono-dualism terravision.
Let’s convene in identifying the concept of universal as mono of one (uni-) and dual of various (-versal) as two opposites turning around a central point making three. This is, universal etymologically, “turned into one”, from unus “one’ from Proto Indo European (PIE) root *oi-no– “one, unique” + past participle of vertere “to turn, turn back, be turned; convert, transform, translate; be changed” (from PIE root *wer– (2) “to turn, bend”). The universal as unity of things around it brings to mind the image of a whirlpool of pulling things inward to its center and deep inside out of view. The concept without further ado can be understood as simply the universal. Overall, as mono-dualism terravision.
Uni/triadism cosmovision.
Let’s start from the Internet. There we get “Concept is a general idea, abstract notion, or fundamental principle that helps us understand a class of things, serving as a mental building block for thoughts, beliefs, and theories … the “why” behind something, an organizing thought. Concepts allow us to categorize and make sense of the world without focusing on every single detail of every object.” Take the case of being before a lineup of animals, say of a horse, a cow, a donkey, and asked to point out the horse. We can identify which is a horse out of the lineup. But what is the horse? Which is a horse and what is the horse are two different things. That is, what makes a horse, horse? Traditionally, concept is another word for universal as seen above.
Now with the benefit of hindsight, the characteristics of the horse fall into three interrelated categories much like the two cathetus-sides and hypotenuse of a right-triangle of the Pythagorean Theorem, hence the notion of triad as in “one whole is made of triad parts”. The triad essentially links the one whole to the three inherently interdependent inseparable parts. The right-triangle is more than three lines. This we express as uni/triadism by way of the PaRaDi/Se principle.
Our definition of concept covers lower universal mono-dualism and higher uni/triad cosmovision. While the former does seem to indicate oneness and turning around this, it falls short of explicitly explaining how one which is unique unmovable could couple with the turning around of various. This would then contrast with the concept as cosmovision as one and triad as uni/triadism. Note that we had to recur to what is not the case to get to what is.
Postulate of the Originary Sign Cosmovision (OSC).
Thought can’t follow things to the beginning, so one has to postulate the Baby Ripple of humanity outside massspacetime. This takes the form of the cosmovision of the originary sign (OSC) which is expressed as the concept of uni/triadism via the PaRaDi/Se principle. That is, using abstract conceptual space and applying the condition of PaRaDi/Se compliance to existing models for concrete actions and policies to real-life problems.
The postulate is needed to avoid the infinite regression to the first beginning, which due to its impossibility would inhibit any argument from ever occurring. Once the postulate is in place, no further direct proof is needed, though its consequences need be provable which is its purpose.
Corruption from anarchy to civilization:
Humanity started as uni/triad cosmovision and later turned into mono-dualism terravision. Corruption is just negation of uni/triadism and uncritical embrace of mono-dualism. By anarchy is meant no rulers, or self-rule, before the holistic person broke down into the priest rulers of religion, the kings rulers of government, and the scribe rulers of knowledge, all over the originary self-ruled agents.
Mesoamerica and Judaism standout from the crowd for being cosmovision more so than terravision. Modern MexoAmerica is a cosmovision insofar as residue of the Originary Sign (OS), hence Originary Sign Cosmovision (OSC). This would then make Israel as First Derivative of the OS Residue of the originary civilizations of Mesopotamia and Egypt, same which lost the OS in the mix with the passage of time. Judaism insofar as it goes back to the originary civilizations is First Derivative holistic as once removed OS cosmovision. It retains cosmovision and doesn’t succumb to terravision. As cosmovision Judaism is a religion, a people, a civilization, and likewise also MexoAmerica in its own unique contrasting manner. A point of nomenclature as Israelism-S / Judaism-DRP, Religion as faith-D Civilization as Kabbalah-R People as ethnicity-P. Likewise, by Mexoamerica is meant composed of MesoAmerica and Andean America.
If this postulate holds, then the beginning state of humanity was anarchy, be it as cave dwelling or hunter-gatherings, and then followed civilization. Anarchy just means order without need of rulers. It started off holistic as uni/triad and along the way corrupted unto mono-dualism. The downfall of humanity in the originary civilizations of East-&-West and not in the interstice Americas requires an explanation. Three differentiating things seem to stand out and are candidates of interest of the causes of corruption. Namely, culture, nature, and the machine as amplified below.
Anarchy of self-rule were happy days, whereas civilization of others-rule are sad days. Anarchy is creativity as freedom from subjection to obedience of civilization.
Let’s start with the Cradle of the West of the parental originary civilizations Egypt and Mesopotamia with offspring Israel as First Derivative, followed by Greece as Second Derivative, which would then make the West Third Derivative. But what is the principle which ultimately gave rise to civilization? This cosmovision we’ll have to postulate as the Originary Sign (OS), inaccessible by all measures, but which manifests in the originary civilizations as the Residue of the OS. The OSC is the postulate of the cradle of cradles.
Now to the Cradle of the World, having the six originary civilizations divided, on the one hand, into four with two in the West of Egypt and Mesopotamia, and two in the East of India and China, and on the other hand, with two in the Interstice of Mesoamerica and Andean.
Somehow the OS Residue didn’t survive in Egypt and Mesopotamia. The conjecture is that it succumbed to corruption. In order to make things more manageable but without loss of generality, let’s put aside India and China, and Andean for the time being. Bad things happen for a good reason, and good things happen for a bad reason. The triad of factors behind the onset of corruption in these advanced civilizations were metallurgy over stone implements, written over oral tradition, and beasts of burden over manual labor. Machine takeover. Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Humanity lost its way. However, it was recovered in Israel through revelation, as the first name of the divine El Shaddai Power Sufficient (אֵ֣ל שַׁדּי) would seem to indicate. That is, enough as not too much and not too little power nor leaning right or left in culture, just enough as found in nature or in culture as anarchy.
This takes us to Mesoamerica. Roughly speaking, Mesoamerica was 6K bce whereas Israel was 4K bce. Here due to its adherence to the principle of sufficient over excess, of stone over iron or bronze, of oral over written tradition, and of manual labor over beasts of burden, that due to resourceful creativity the OS Residue survived. This originary civilization carried over the OSC Residue as Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli (Flower Song / Life) or else as Ixtli Áyotl / Yoliztli (Face Heart / Life). In the case of Israel as First Derivative it survived as Alef / BeReshIth (A/InBeginningOf) (א/בְּ-רֵאשִׁ֖-ית).
In the greatest scheme of things, Israel’s kabbalah acknowledges Mesoamerica as the OS Residue, all the while Mesoamerica’s ayotl validates Israel as 1st Derivative of the cosmovision of originary civilizations of Egypt-&-Mesopotamia. This is, on the one hand, in its codices it appears as Xóchitl–P (_)-RCuícatl–D / Yoliztli–S, and on the other hand, in Genesis 1:1a/Alef as Alef-Scovert-/-overt BeReshIth-DRP, Be-D Resh-R Ith-P, respectively. In the vernacular the former stands for Flower-P (_)-R Song-D earth-/-heaven Life-S, and the latter for A-S covert-/-overt InBeginning-DRP, In-D Beginning-R Of-P.
Now to the Originary Sign Cosmovision (OSC). The PaRaDi/Se principle, standing for One Whole-S be-/-becomes Triad parts-DRP, with In-D Inter-R Out-P. This is specifically illustrated as Right-Triangle-S the-/-a Three intrinsic parts-DRP, Vertical imaginary cathetus-D Hypotenuse complex-R Horizontal real cathetus-P.
The OSC stands in Mesoamerica for PRD/S all the while in Israel for S/DRP, or else jointly as the PaRaDi/Se principle. They are as mirror images of each other. In the kabbalah tradition the PaRaDi/Se principle is an acronym standing for Sod Secret (סוֹד)-S / Derash Discover (דְּרַשׁ)-DRemez Remit (רֶמֶז)-RPeshat Plain (פְּשָׁט)-P. Or else simply as The Creator-S of creative-/-creature of Creation-DRP, of Spiritual-D Mental-R Physical-P. Roughly speaking, from the above one concludes that Israel is “Pray-&-obey”, all the while Mesoamerica is “be creative”.
But the proof of the pudding is in the eating. Let’s exemplify. Cosmology is all there is in creation, so let’s use Newtonian physics to illustrate the point. Force equals mass times acceleration, which in dimensions comes across as Force = mass-space/time2, which in Kabbayotlogy would then be Force-S heaven-/-earth formula-DRP, Time-D Space-R Mass-P. Another illustrative example referred to our subject matter would be: OSC-S / Kabbayotlogy-DRP, Israel’s kabbalah-D Mesoamerica’s ayotl-R Greece’s logos-P. By the way, the author isn’t invisible, the application would be Calling-S / Mission-DRP, Cause-D Message-R Movement-P.
This should suffice for the time being to get the kind reader started in the delight that follows.
The root cause of antiSemitism and of antiMesoamericanism is its being a memento of the cosmovision of the times of anarchy even before the six originary civilizations. Mesoamerica is residue of the Originary Sign Cosmovision (OSC) and Israel is First Derivative (1stD) of the residue of the OSC of Egypt-&-Mesopotamia. Mesoamerica-&-Israel are uninterrupted successors of the OSC in times of rational Enlightenment and onwards to present day Modernity.
~
The Jews were chosen by the Creator and the politicians are chosen by the Electorate. Neither Jewry nor politicians deliver on expectations leaving the people waiting and wanting. The former were meant to be creative like the Creator, a light unto the nations of the world, while the latter were meant to bring to fruition social wellbeing.
Simply deliver the good-&-goods, of the OSC and the 53i+ State, respectively.
~
The condition of possibility for peace in the World and Middle East is the Originary Sign Cosmovision theory and its numerous applications. The norm is PaRaDi/Se compliance. At present we have the “31a-” State of the Enlightenment and the “53i+” State of the OSC is what we should have.
The “31a-” State is 3-powers, 1-vote per person, adult suffrage, and downhill to duocracy. Whereas the “53i+” State is 5-powers adding Media 4th and University 5th, 3-votes per person, infant suffrage as Women Suffrage 2.0, and uphill to democracy.
In following is my contribution as cosmovisionist member of the community to the “The Future We’re Building Together: Message from The CBI Board”, by the president, as concluding part of “Visioning Outcomes from 2025 Board retreat”, by the consultant. CBI is acronym for Congregation Beth Israel. Both documents are beautiful, verily the work of inspiration, cannot be improved upon, and well deserve dissemination. Hope I have faithfully interpreted their feelings. I’ll do my very best to seamlessly weave my notes to the original setting rack whose same formatting will be kept for ease of referencing. My take consist of comments to the original document of the consultant and the president as well as of a few sections afterward for the development of the proposed cosmovision. I pray that this tapestry of colorful ideals from all three providers meets the high standards and excitement of the Congregation. Faith is being lost all across the board of congregations. Our rise is everybody’s! Please allow me to expound the argument counting on your caring attention.
Overall, we’re stepping onto unchartered territory as we reach out from our comfort zone to the greater Austin community and beyond. These times of crisis require a changing of the Guard. The charge on the leadership and kehillah is the elaboration of the strategic plan. This enhanced rough draft of a project consisting of the original text with comments is meant for discussion by peers starting with the leadership and escalating up to the congregation at large. Hopefully, may it also serve as discussion guide in the gatherings on Justice/justice on Peace in the Whole World and in the Middle East. The choice before us is between leading or following, of a PaRaDi/Se cosmovision principle-based project, or of a laundry list of Issues, of the “53i+” State or the “31a-” State, respectively.
The hope is that this butterfly ripple cosmovision of Peace be adopted as founding document moving forward to fulfill the revealed holistic and triadic visions of all concerned. It may be small but it’s powerful. The challenge is to disseminate this message near and far. This crown jewel was meant for wearing high on the head and not for hiding in a treasure chest.
Recall in all this that the burden of proof falls on the shoulders of who’s making the assertion. The status quo has the advantage since it is the case, requiring no further proof, no disproving that it isn’t the case. Nonetheless, the status quo position is still held accountable for its performance for better or for worse. It’s still not off the hook, either. But, besides that, and most importantly, given the complexity of the concepts involved we’ve opted in favor of synthesis over analysis by preferring abstract space over textual space. This should explain the extent of the essay as well as the ample use of formulas and symbols. And as a last comment, for a more robust account of the characters involved and the argument laid out, please consult the sources in Leadership and Bibliography at the end of the essay.
The Complete CBI Vision Journey: From Dreams to Excitement
Audacious Dreams That Emerged:
The Board’s individual stars revealed a community that is both sanctuary and beacon.
A place where divine presence dwells and worship is transformative
Multiple generations learning and growing together
Environment and social justice leadership that inspires other communities
Expansion beyond one campus to create satellite Jewish communities throughout Austin
Resilient community that has navigated challenges while staying true to core values
Transformation for Impact/Legacy
The small groups distilled this into two powerful themes:
Creating Sacred Ecosystem:
A space/community that serves as an incubator for change
Strengthening communal fabric that inspires transformation
Collective action that articulates a shared vision together
A place of AWE with reputation and space to inspire excellence
“Feels Magical”- capturing the unmistakable sense that God is in this place
Austin as the Stage:
The recognition that Austin is a good place to be Jewish
Creating space as meaningful in the future as in the present
CBI as a model that radiates outward into the broader community
What the Board is Most Excited About
The closing energy was palpable:
“Making Judaism relevant again” – ensuring Jewish wisdom speaks to contemporary life (from Rabbi L)
“Fund raising is FUN!” – the excitement of building something extraordinary together
The anticipation of being part of something transformative and lasting
The Bottom Line
The Board articulated a vision of CBI as a spiritual ecosystem that transforms both individuals and the broader Austin community. They’re not just planning to develop a synagogue and a campus with the Day School – they’re architecting a Jewish renaissance that will ripple outward for generations. And most importantly, they’re genuinely excited about the work ahead to make it happen.
The combination of audacious dreaming, clear transformation themes, and infectious enthusiasm suggests the Board is ready to take the bold action toward the inspiring future.
These are the comments to the consultant’s visioning outcomes text of the Board’s retreat 2025.
The Complete CBI Vision Journey: From Dreams to Excitement
Comment: The congregation is holistic and is triadically constituted as kehillah, sanctuary and beacon. Leadership is born out of heeding the calling from the heart, aligning it with the head, and putting the hands on the job.
Transformation for Impact/Legacy
Comment: In mnemonic code, the Model-C cosmovision applies wholeheartedly. Creator-S creative-/-creature Creation-DRP; Civilization-D Constitution-R Culture-P. Or else, Originary Sign-S creative-/-creature Cosmovision-DRP; Religion-D Philosophy-R Science-P.
Cosmovision isn’t religion, though mentions Moses and the Torah, isn’t philosophy though mentions Pythagoras and triads, isn’t science though mentions Newton-Einstein and Big Bang cosmology. It’s holistic understood not as mono-dualism of monotheism-duohumanism, but rather as uni/triadism of unitheism/triadhumanism. That is, of S/DRP or else of PRD/S.
What the Board is Most Excited About
Comment: In code, Judaism-S heart-/-face Energy-DRP, Wisdom-D, Relevance-R Funds-P. The times dictate the character of the spiritual leader needed from Moses the shepherd to Moses the prophet. Things which before were taken for granted now require enquiring. Case in point, the role of Israel in the world and of the world in Israel. Outreach or fencing-in, that’s the quest.
What will the Middle East be to the world, aside from the site of the Garden of Eden? Will it be for the war that ended all wars, or for the peace that ended all wars?
The Bottom Line
Comment: We’re witnessing the change of the Old Guard of mono-dualism unto the New Guard of uni/triadism. Going beyond a dualistic Issues approach to a holistic one of Principle and applications, respectively. Solely the Cosmic vision can deliver. The Orbital vision just keeps spinning its wheels on a time loop. The problem with the Issues approach is it’s always falling behind and playing catchup.
The combination of audacious dreaming, clear transformation themes, and infectious enthusiasm suggests the Board is ready to take the bold action toward the inspiring future
Comment: The crisis of the Enlightenment State rests on the foundations of the West, which are Israel’s faith and Greece’s reason, and ultimately on the Orbital vision of what humanity means as a project. This irremediably remits us to seek out at the core of the sphere wherein entering turns going out as ex nihilo springs of what we understand as effective creation. The problem with proximate causation as regards justice is that it’s a half-empty half-full ordeal. Solely an ultimate causation approach can wholly remedy a desperate situation. Solely the ultimate cause will do, nothing less will.
The Future We’re Building Together: A Message from The CBI Board
Our Audacious Dream
Imagine walking into CBI in 2035 and feeling something unmistakable – **God is in this place** The building hums with joyful, bustling activity. Worship is transformative. Learning flows between generations. Our community has become the natural gathering place where Austin Jews go to connect with each other and with the Divine.
Here’s what makes us most excited. CBI has become so much more than a synagogue.
We’re Creating a Jewish Renaissance in Austin
A Spiritual Ecosystem That Radiates Outward
We’re not just building one thriving campus – we’re nurturing satellite Jewish communities throughout Austin. Wherever Jews naturally gather, CBI’s spirit of learning, and joy takes root. Austin has become known as a place where it’s good to be Jewish, and CBI is the beating heart of that renaissance.
Environmental and Social Justice Leadership
CBI has earned recognition as a leader in sustainability and social action. Other Jewish communities look to us as a model. We’re proving that ancient Jewish wisdom and contemporary challenges aren’t separate – they’re inseparable. When the world needs healing, people think of CBI.
Multigenerational Learning and Growth
Our Hebrew school doesn’t just survive – it thrives with diverse learners across all backgrounds. Sons and daughters become B’nai Mitzvah in a community where every generation learns from every other generation. Jewish wisdom flows naturally through our community like a living river.
What Makes This Vision Possible
We’ve Learned to Navigate Change While Staying True
CBI has successfully weathered challenging times by keeping focus on what truly attracts people: authentic spiritual fulfillment, non-judgmental community, passionate learning, and the call to serve others. We’ve become resilient without losing our soul.
We Create Space That Feels Magical
There’s something about being at CBI that people can’t quite put their finger on – it just feels different. Sacred. Alive. It’s a place of awe that inspires excellence in everyone who walks through our doors.
We Make Judaism Relevant Again
We’ve cracked the code on making ancient Jewish wisdom speak powerfully to contemporary life. People don’t just come in to CBI out of obligation – they come because Jewish life here is meaningful, transformative, and joyful.
Why We’re So Excited
This Vision is Already Beginning
We’re not talking about a distant dream – we’re describing the community we’re actively building together. Every Shabbat, every learning season, every act of Tikkun Olam is a step towards that reality.
The Work Ahead Is Inspiring
Yes, we have big goals. Yes, it will take dedication and resources. But here’s what surprised us in our planning: **even fundraising feels fun when you’re building something this extraordinary.** When you can envision the Jewish renaissance we’re creating, investing in it becomes a joy, not a burden.
Austin is Ready for This
We live in a city that values innovation, community, and justice. Austin is hungry for what we’re offering. The question isn’t whether this vision is possible – it’s how quickly we can make it real.
What This Means for You
You’re not Just a Member of our Synagogue
You’re becoming part of a movement to transform Jewish life in Austin. You’re helping create the community that your children and grandchildren will treasure and that other cities will seek to emulate.
Your Voice and Vision Matter
This is just the beginning of our visioning process. We want to hear your dreams, your ideas, your excitement about what CBI can become. Together, we’ll refine and expand this vision until it truly represents our entire community.
The Future Starts Now
Every person who joins this vision, every family that gets involved, every act of learning and service moves us closer to the thriving Jewish community Austin deserves.
Highlight(s) since last report (By the Executive Director)
Last week the CBI staff held a retreat at Shalom Austin. The majority of our time focused on vision-building with Fayruz Benyusef. Unsurprisingly, but excitingly, there was significant alignment with the ideas and visions that came out of the board retreat. I am excited about the work that comes next to grow our vision!
The Future We’re Building Together: A Message from The CBI Board
Comment: This is the text outlining a strategic plan by the Board president. Strategy is to tactics as principle is to issues. The consultant set the tone, the president stipulated the ends, and the author of this brief essay provided the means. The message by the Board leadership is taken literally, not figurative nor rhetorically. Enunciation is promise made and meant to be kept. I’m sure that more people would come to the Board meetings if they knew what they were missing.
Back in the sixties (60s) of the XX century the times were a-changing. Half a century later, now in the twenties (20s) of the XXI century, the times have a-changed. This could very well be the gate to the unification of humanity as Reform Judaism 2.0, or else simply Israelism II!
Our Audacious Dream
Imagine walking into CBI in 2035 and feeling something unmistakable – **God is in this place** The building hums with joyful, bustling activity. Worship is transformative. Learning flows between generations. Our community has become the natural gathering place where Austin Jews go to connect with each other and with the Divine.
Here’s what makes us most excited. CBI has become so much more than a synagogue.
Comment: The return of the Shekhinah, of the presence of the Divine in our midst, absent since the times of the Second Temple. And it’s happening more so in the Diaspora of the Americas than in Israel of the Middle East.
We’re Creating a Jewish Renaissance in Austin
Comment: To get it right and updated with the times, the revelation of the point/origin always starts at the mysterious pre-beginning, with due allowance for the covert Divine unfolding as overt Creation mediated by humanity. That is, as in One Creator-S creative-/-creature Triad Creation-DRP, made of Spiritual-D Mental-R Physical-P. Succinctly, the Originary Sign (OS) is “theone whole is and becomes triad parts”, or else in acronym formula the Universal Principle of Knowledge as PaRaDi/Se. The sense of the OS comes more from live usage than by rote definition. This work attempts to resolve the knowledge problem of civilization once and for all.
A Spiritual Ecosystem That Radiates Outward
We’re not just building one thriving campus – we’re nurturing satellite Jewish communities throughout Austin. Wherever Jews naturally gather, CBI”s spirit of learning, and joy takes root. Austin has become known as a place where it’s good to be Jewish, and CBI is the beating heart of that renaissance.
Comment: Justice/justice you’ll pursue. The repetition of the word justice indicates repeating it twice over, thus making four levels of meaning. This is just another application of abstract S/DRP (פרד/ס), of medieval PaRDeS, and lately of primeval PaRaDi/Se as crafted by the author in 2018. Case in point, this is illustrated by using the analogy of a painting on a wall. There’s the wall, there’s the frame, there’s the canvas, and there’s the picture. Next properly identify the pieces employing the above scheme as Wall-S covert-/-overt Frame-D Canvas-R Picture-P.
Environmental and Social Justice Leadership
CBI has earned recognition as a leader in sustainability and social action. Other Jewish communities look to us as a model. We’re proving that ancient Jewish wisdom and contemporary challenges aren’t separate – they’re inseparable. When the world needs healing, people think of CBI.
Comment: In the world to come, what will we reply to R’ Tarfon’s (רַבִּי טַרְפוֹן) inquiry about Tikkun Olam Repairing the world (תִּיקּוּן עוֹלָם)? Will our reply be that we were too busy “succeeding, eating, and having fun”? No! Rather that we took the lead in repairing the world instead of following in the footsteps of those breaking it more. But we all need to do our part. This reminds one of Scrooge when inquired about the poor. His reply was that the poor is a problem for the state’s politicians not for the church’s faithful. Stepping out of one’s comfort zone is challenging. Let’s not forget Aristotle’s words that humans as zoon politikon political animals. So then, CBI isn’t alone, it’s got plenty of company. Social justice borders politics. The buzz words is the spectrum of affordability and affluency. The tradition emphasizes pursuing justice, justice as if saying let the state pursue justice and let the church pursue justice as well.
Justice/justice starts from the bottom up with the originary Americans, their mixed DNA descendants, followed closely by Afro-descendants, the contemporary poor, and on up the deep dark well. Provide leadership to a bewildered world. After two millennia of Tikkun Olam World Repairing (תִּיקּוּן עוֹלָם) of PaRDeS kabbalah, it’s time to try Shalom Olam World Peace (שָׁלֽוֹם עוֹלָם) of primeval kabbalah of the PaRaDi/Se principle of the OSC. You can fix things all you want, yet you’ll never make it shalem whole (שָׁלֵם) if you don’t know shalom peace (שָׁלֽוֹם).
Multigenerational Learning and Growth
Our Hebrew school doesn’t just survive – it thrives with diverse learners across all backgrounds. Sons and daughters become B’nai Mitzvah in a community where every generation learns from every other generation. Jewish wisdom flows naturally through our community like a living river.
Comment: With the inauguration of TheCosmovisionAge of Peace and discarding mono-dualism of Enlightenment we’ll now have to relearn everything from the bottom up with the PaRaDi/Se Principle. Fun or enjoyment is futile and isn’t the same as peace. This means that all Bibles would have to be rewritten to update with this finding since comments are interpretation in translation. The name of Cosmovision (Joy) is a placeholder till the kehillah comes up with a more suitable denomination. In the meantime, this document can serve as primer orientation for the New Age. The OSC PaRaDi/Se principle is so overwhelming requiring its own age, much like a spring flowing filling a pool won’t fit anymore into a glass of water. The theory of the concept and its applications to resolve everyday problems.
What Makes This Vision Possible
Comment: Happiness and suffering are futile, solely creative living is fruitful. The charge is to offer guidance on the conditions for change and to take initiative of the way forward. If things make you happy, then happiness can be bought, but it’s not joy! Solely creative activity and active creativity brings peace. (Kohelet)
The thing is that money brings power, like in Elohim Powers (אֱלֹהִים) who was created by Creation BeReshIth InBeginningOf (בְּרֵאשִׁ֖ית), which was created by the Creator Alef A (א), and who in turn created dialogue with the heavens and dialogue with the earth bara’ ’Elohim ’eth hashshamáyim ve’eth haaretz (בָּרָ֣א אֱלֹהִ֑ים אֵ֥ת הַשָּׁמַ֖יִם וְאֵ֥ת הָאָֽרֶץ). The human drive for power can be explained with creative creature toys in the sandbox.
We’ve Learned to Navigate Change While Staying True
CBI has successfully weathered challenging times by keeping focus on what truly attracts people: authentic spiritual fulfillment, non-judgmental community, passionate learning, and the call to serve others. We’ve become resilient without losing our soul.
Comment: Integration always, assimilation never. The challenge is to find light and compass in our own uniqueness out of the greatest scheme of things.
We Create Space That Feels Magical
There’s something about being at CBI that people can’t quite put their finger on – it just feels different. Sacred. Alive. It’s a place of awe that inspires excellence in everyone who walks through our doors.
Comment: The point/origin of Moses’ Pentateuch is based on the primeval kabbalah of Alef/BeReshIth A/InBeginningOf (א/בְּ-רֵאשִׁ֖-ית). But insofar as Israel is just 1st Derivative, not one of the six (6) originary civilizations, it still needs validation by any one of these to demonstrate that it is derived from the residue of the Originary Sign (OS). (Por si las moscas.)
We Make Judaism Relevant Again
We’ve cracked the code on making ancient Jewish wisdom speak powerfully to contemporary life. People don’t just come in to CBI out of obligation – they come because Jewish life here is meaningful, transformative, and joyful.
Comment: The Jews were chosen by the Creator and the politicians are chosen by the Electorate. Then, why are politicians disliked? Perhaps for the same reason that Jews are not liked. That is, on account of not delivering on expectations and only getting richer and more powerful all the while the people are kept waiting and wanting. The former were meant to be creative like the Creator, a light unto the nations of the world, with the latter elected to bring about a social project to fruition. The key is to deliver the good and the goods, respectively.
Judaism is understood as monotheism within dualism invoicing of 2nd Derivative Greece and 3rd Derivative West. Beney Israel is better understood as Theism/Humanism within uni/triadism as 1st Derivative of the residue of the OS of Mexoamerica of the PaRaDi/Se Principle. Proof suffices that YHVH Powers YodHehVavHehElohim (יְהֹוָ֥ה אֱלֹהִ֖ים) matches as Y-SElo-/-him H-D V-R H-P. The Rabbinic is placed by hand, all the while the Biblical derives from the OS.
Why We’re So Excited
Comment:It’s about getting our act together, about placing our ducks in a row. Mnemonically encapsulated in the Model-H: Holistic-S is-/-becomes Human-DRP, Heart-D Head-R Hands-P.
This Vision is Already Beginning
We’re not talking about a distant dream – we’re describing the community we’re actively building together. Every Shabbat, every learning season, every act of Tikkun Olam is a step towards that reality.
Comment: As naming goes, cosmic vision, panoramic vision, or cosmovision. Succinctly, as Originary Sign-S / Cosmovision-DRP, Justice/justice-D Fair State-R Social Justice-P. Alternatively, as OS-S / PaRaDi/Se Cosmic vision-DRP, Humane Civilization-D 53i+ Constitution-R Social Justice Issues-P.
The Work Ahead Is Inspiring
Yes, we have big goals. Yes, it will take dedication and resources. But here’s what surprised us in our planning: **even fundraising feels fun when you’re building something this extraordinary.** When you can envision the Jewish renaissance we’re creating, investing in it becomes a joy, not a burden.
Comment: Renaissance means turning the page on Ravism I-XX centuries and Enlightenment Age XVIII of II Millennium, unto Peace Era XXI onwards of III Millennium. Much like getting a second wind when jogging. It’s like putting water with a dispenser or soupspoon, and nothing happens, until suddenly with almost nothing more than a drop the glass spills over.
The Old Guard stressed obedience per the six hundred thirteen (613) commandments and later on summarized in the ten (10) sayings of Moses. But the gematria math is final insofar as 613 => 6+1+3 = 10 => 1+0 =1! But what is this one sign? The OS was lost in the rubble stack till now.
Austin is Ready for This
We live in a city that values innovation, community, and justice. Austin is hungry for what we’re offering. The question isn’t whether this vision is possible – it’s how quickly we can make it real.
Comment: Strike it while it’s hot. (¡Que el horno no está para bollos!) With fresh attacks by the Government on Education, on the Media, and on Services, it’s time to respond in kind to ensure this doesn’t happen again moving forward. Postulate the “53i+” State Constitution. That is, of making the autonomous News Media 4th power and the University 5th power of the Judicial 3rd Power. A 5-power state, 3 votes/person, tutored infant suffrage, plus (+) much more. The Enlightenment “31a-” State is a dead lion; the alley cat “53i+” State makes a better pet. Tutored Infant Suffrage is Women Suffrage 2.0!
What This Means for You
Comment: The Middle East is the elephant in the room. The Haaretz are too close to be objective and the Diaspora are too far to be subjective. Solely CBI’s Ripple 20-20 cosmovision can get the job done. That is, one can derive the six-hundred (613) commandments on our own in following the imperative sole (1) commandment of being creative. Why? Because! Because of whom we are as creative creatures.
You’re not Just a Member of our Synagogue
You’re becoming part of a movement to transform Jewish life in Austin. You’re helping create the community that your children and grandchildren will treasure and that other cities will seek to emulate.
Comment: Abstracting it one step further we would get OS-S covert-/-overt Cosmovision-DRP, Humane Civilization-D Fair State-R Social Justice-P.
Post-Ravism means turning the page of history after the two-thousand year reign of authority and welcoming the foot Children of Israel. Ravism refers to the rabbinic interpretation of the Torah as solely consisting of an imposing YHVH and a tamed human obedient to a myriad of commandments. Post-Ravism refers to an enhanced relationship with the Torah between the Creator of creation and the creative creature of humanity.
Your Voice and Vision Matter
This is just the beginning of our visioning process. We want to hear your dreams, your ideas, your excitement about what CBI can become. Together, we’ll refine and expand this vision until it truly represents our entire community.
Comment: This is the view of a community member to construct the strategic plan of CBI. The PRD/S cosmovision of Mesoamerica of Toltecáyotl as Xóchitl-P Cuícatl-D / Yoliztli-S(Flower-P Song-D / Life–S) is essentially the same and thus validates Israel’s Moses oftheBurning bush–PCalling–D, thenEmpowerment–R, next Hinnéni-/-theophany and finally Ehyehasher ehyeh I am that I am (אֶֽהְיֶ֖ה אֲשֶׁ֣ר אֶֽהְיֶ֑ה)-S.
The difrasism Xóchitl-P Cuícatl-D / Yoliztli-S be confused as metaphor, then metaphysics, then pre-philosophy. There was whole cosmovision long before the shards of religion, philosophy, and science came into being. By the way, it’s not mono-dualism of one breaking into three separate types, rather it’s uni/triadism. Moses got it whole, but ensuing scribal biased interpretations stressed obedience and neglected the creativity half. Thankfully, it’s corrected herein before more damage is done downstream.
The Future Starts Now
Every person who joins this vision, every family that gets involved, every act of learning and service moves us closer to the thriving Jewish community Austin deserves.
Comment: It’s better to preemptively start the future now than to say twenty years later that it started back then in the past. The thing is that creativity maps out the righteous path. Much like the Action principle in science of determining the actual path as the optimal use of resources. Let’s now focus to disseminate the cause. It’s hard to be a Jew, and it’s not easy to stay Originary American, either.
Reaching out to the greater community is but the micro of the macro of connecting with the originary civilization. Truly the world wide web of humanity. It all starts with the family cell and goes through social communities all the way to continental civilizations. What grows a community beyond shouting distance isn’t just a sense of belonging as if a set, but the OS of the logic of being creative creatures. The condition of possibility of community is being creative. Creativity is discovering the laws that govern us and that one ought to obey and follow to achieve fruitfulness. Freedom is whole knowledge manifest as triad.
The short-term goal is dissemination to achieve awareness and success. The medium-term goal is ending violence, polarization and preparing for the transition by letting go of the past and grabbing hold of the future. The long-term goal is to debunk the period of PostModernity of the Enlightenment Age as transitional Absurdity phase and to move on to inaugurate the Peace Age as the second wind of humanity.
Comment: It’s hard to turbocharge a conversation in the congregation if no one outside the boardroom knows about it.
Highlight(s) since last report (By the Executive Director)
Last week the CBI staff held a retreat at Shalom Austin. The majority of our time focused on vision-building with Fayruz Benyusef. Unsurprisingly, but excitingly, there was significant alignment with the ideas and visions that came out of the board retreat. I am excited about the work that comes next to grow our vision!
Comment: Searching for the point/origin of things is a good beginning for a happy ending.
The acid test moving forward of making sense is the PaRaDi/Se standard. That is, everything which is the case must be PaRaDi/Se compliant.
Many points were left pending on the inkwell. One amongst many left out from being adequately addressed is raising a family.
The uniqueness of Israel identifies it as the microcosm of the world such that in order to understand its place in the greater scheme of things requires understanding the hemispheres of East and West in addition to the interstice North and South of the Americas. And timewise as well as far back as the collapse of the Bronze and beginning of the Iron Age, sufficiently to cover the epochs of hunter-gatherers, a transitional state of pure unadulterated self-government of good anarchy, and the start of the six (6) originary civilizations. By anarchy is meant a holistic state of being human previous to the rise of the priest, the scribe in written or the sages in oral tradition, and the king. To do so in an orderly manner requires postulating the Cosmovision Age of Peace , and CBI butterfly Ripple Cosmovision of Peace, similar to the Big Bang of the universe, when humanity as such properly came into being out of the vacuum background of the opaque theory of evolution. It is just an ideal reference point and nothing more is implied.
This view of Israel as unique constitutes the Cosmic Option, while the Orbital Option views it as an ordinary nation state. Today’s contemporary crisis goes back to the classical West based on Greece-of-Reason and the Israel-of-Faith. Roughly speaking, the problem with this time reference is that this double cradle dates only four thousand years back (3-4K) with Israel first followed by Greece, whereas the six (6) originary civilizations date from ten thousand (6-10K) years ago. If Revelation to Moses had occurred before the originary civilizations, and not the other way around, then there would be no wellspring to pursue. But being the case that cause precedes effects, we’re now forced to come up with the necessary and sufficient conditions to account for the role that Israel plays in the state of things of the world. And this is the case irrespective of beliefs, values, or interests of the players in question.
Additionally, and so as to avoid an indefinite regression to the unknowable beginning of humanity, we’ll instead simply postulate the point/origin of the Originary Sign (OS) of knowledge as such event. Something along the lines of 0/123. Point/Origin. Or in terms of our PaRaDi/Se formulaic nomenclature, OS-S unknown-/-known Residue-DRP. More generally, recall that Unknown unknown-S covert-/-overt Unknown-D Known known-R Known-P. While we will never know what the OS was and is, but we do know thanks to Mesoamerica that the residue of the OS was PRD/S, and additionally, that the 1st Derivative of Israel was S/DRP.
So then, let’s start by postulating the Originary Sign (OS) of civilization in the remote past, an augmented democracy of unadulterated good anarchy as heartful harmony. Like in a saturated solution you still need a seed crystal around which to crystallize. This OS is secret, inaccessible and solely serves for purpose of reference, as point/origin, much like the beginning of time itself in any Creation story. In the originary civilizations, all we have access is to the residue of this OS. The challenge is that Israel isn’t one of the six (6) originary civilization, rather it is First (1st) Derivative out of Mesopotamia and Egypt. Thus, the doubt remains as to the authenticity of Israel’s entitlement to knowledge. Its claim needs validation by an originary civilization to make the direct connection with the residue of the OS. Hierarchically, this would make Israel twice removed from the OS, or else once removed from an originary civilization as depository of the residue of the OS.
The OS model of a thesis shakes the very foundations of the West which is built on the triple cornerstone from Antiquity of beliefs of Israel, values of Greece, and interests of Rome. While the hypothesis doesn’t discredit the mainstay of the West, it does bring into question how these three derived civilizations historically relate to the legacy one originary civilization.
To get a sense of proportion and significance, the search for the point/origin of the universe took us to the Big Bang of cosmology, only to discover that reason is under 5% right on account of the so-called dark energy-and-matter! Likewise, to access the OS we need to go to the point/origin of civilization. The Torah is like cosmology in that our understanding of it is under 5%, anything less would keep us in the black. Or alternatively, cosmology is like the Torah, we understand but 5% of it, if less we wouldn’t even be aware of it.
Surprisingly, the solution comes from the least likely of places, from the nearby Americas to the south! The status of Israel is twice removed from the residue of OS. Solely the Cosmic Option can serve Tikkun Olam. The microcosm is reflected in the macrocosm. The cosmic as order of the large and small means that solely the simplest can be the generalest. In other words, the point/origin serves as coordinate system of reference of the universe.
In this quick heuristic version and without loss of generality we’ll leave aside the originary civilizations of India and China since their influence was localized. Likewise, we’ll leave aside the Andean originary civilization for the same reason, pending research. Recall that lack of proof is not proof of absence. In any case, none of these five (5) has a clear core pinnacle message that I’m aware. This leaves Mesoamerica as the sole originary civilization left standing. Also note the independence of the previous three (3) Asian and one (1) African originary civilizations from the two (2) of the Americas, since the transit across the Bering Strait occurred some twenty thousand years ago (20K), long before any signs of civilization appeared ten thousand (10K) years later. My guess as to why the OS residue survived in Mesoamerica, besides its relative isolation till 1492, may have been due to having been an oral tradition and thus uncorrupted by written mode. The heart kept its being uncorrupted by the mind as through the hand of scribes. This refers to the Model-H of Holy-S in heaven-/-out of heaven Human-DRP, Heart-D Head-R Hands-P.
Fast forward to Enlightenment XVIII century, cutting through the Middle Ages, and through Antiquity of Greece VI-IV bce and Israel XII bce. The problem is that this last one was around three thousand (3K) years ago whereas civilization dates from ten thousand years (10K) in the Middle East and six thousand years (6K) in the Americas, roughly speaking. There must have been an inaccessible reference Butterfly Ripple of humanity as the OS of which we only have the earliest residue as Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli (Flower Song / Life) in Mesoamerica. By the look of things, putting aside the five (5) originary civilizations for the moment, it seems that out of Mesopotamia and Egypt came Israel’s First (1st) Derivative with Moses’ Alef/BeReshIth. The point as we’ll soon see is that the residue of the OS of Mesoamerica’s Toltecáyotl of Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli seems to confirm the derived legitimacy of Israel’s kabbalah in that these are mirror images of each other. In a certain sense, kabbalah and toltecáyotl of Israel and Mesoamerica is the closest there is to cosmovision.
On the other hand, within the tradition of Israel, we shouldn’t lose sight of the One (1) unique commandment on account of the six-hundred thirteen (613) secondary commandments. One shouldn’t lose sight of the forest on account of the trees. Briefly, the One (1) imperative commandment is mentioned but isn’t sufficiently stressed in the Torah to stand out of the Ten (10) Sayings. Just do the gematria math to convince yourself: 613 => 6 + 1 + 3 = 10 => 1+0 = 1! Maybe, just maybe humanity had to go from savagery to civilization through the six hundred thirteen (613) ordinary commandments to be ready for the one (1) unique commandment which consists in being creative creature of civilization as much as YHYH is Creator of creation.
A short but relevant parenthesis. Today, under the reign of mono-dualism, we have humanism in classical Greece and theism in biblical Israel. The question is whether keeping humanism and theism separate is the solution to or the cause of crisis. Mono-dualism is the problem; with uni/triadism the solution. Solely uni/triadism can bring together the ends under one universal principle of knowledge. The thing is that without Mesoamerica’s residue of the OS, Israel’s Alef / BeReshIth wouldn’t have been authenticated. And without Israel’s, Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli as the residue of the OS wouldn’t have been identified. That said, let’s now continue our quest on the role of Israel in the greater world narrative, but not before pulling the rug from under our feet.
The cradle of the West is not that of the World. The cradle of the World is not Greece-Israel, but rather it’s the originary civilization of Mesoamerica as the residue of the OS. This is followed by First (1st) Derivative Israel, out of originary civilizations Mesopotamia and Egypt, followed by Second (2nd) Derivative Greece, with background these two originaries plus barbarian Europe.
This question has to do with removing the rug under the feet of theism and humanism. In simplified mode, the West is founded on the belief that the cradle of civilization is having Israel as Church and Greece as State. The problem is that the civilizations of Israel-Greece date from 3.5K years ago while the six (6) originary civilizations of Mesopotamia, Egypt, China, India, Mesoamerica, and Andean date from 10-6K years back. So it happens that now, on the one hand, we have the Israel-Greece cradle of Western civilization, and on the other hand, we the primeval cradle of Originary Mesoamerican civilization. This primeval cradle is then followed by First (1st) Derivative Israel, Second(2nd) Derivative Greece, Third (3rd) Derivative West, and so on. Recall that Israel is seen through the lens of Christian Hellenism.
To make sense of things requires postulating an Originary Sign (OS) and then searching for the residue of the OS in the cosmovision of the originary civilizations. Putting China, India and Andean aside for the moment, without loss of generality, let’s focus on Mesoamerica and the resultant of Mesopotamia and Egypt by way of Israel as its First (1st) Derivative. The conclusion is that the gist of Mesoamerica is Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli (Flower Song / Life) or else Ixtli Áyotl / Yoliztli (Face Heart / Life), and that of Israel is Alef / BeReshIth (A / InBeginningOf) of Genesis 1:1a/Alef.
Thanks to Hebrew kabbalah of S/DRP that it was possible to identify the Nahuatl toltecáyotl and found that they’re mirror images of each other, as S/DRP and PRD/S, respectively. That is, Israel’s S/DRP is deductive, due to revelation, and requiring prayer and obedience, whereas Mesoamerica’s PRD/S is inductive, due to discovery, and requiring creative activity. That is, we relied on the known cradle of the West with primeval kabbalah of Alef / BeReshIth to identify the unknown cradle of the World of Toltecáyotl of Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli.
Needless to say, this work is footer research. Heuristically, in this sense we would have OS-S covert-/-overt Religion-D Philosophy-R Science-P. The trend is from mono-dualism of monotheism-duohumanism of Israel-Greece to uni/triadism of unitheism of Israel / triadhumanism of Mesoamerica. This reconfiguration of the character of church and state turns their separation meaningless.
An image which may prove helpful is to view theism of church and humanism of state as water buckets floating on the pool of cosmovision of the Originary Sign. The myth ailing modernity consists in thinking of the water buckets as civilization’s cradle of theism and of humanism as being on firm ground when they’re actually floating on the pool of the OSC!
The problem with the theses of atheism and humanism, or alternatively of theism and ahumanism, is that the assumption of the cradle of civilization of Israel-Greece is unfounded. Neither Jerusalem nor Athens were capitals of originary civilizations. Any topic taken out of either water bucket is fine, ultimately, they’re distinctions which don’t make a difference, but not so fast if trying out synergy. The water buckets simply don’t add up other than their shared liquid content. Solely the pool of water upon which the buckets float of a cosmovision of originary civilizations makes sense as the primeval cradle of civilization.
Let me explain step by step. The die-hard myth is the cradle of civilization of Israel-Church and Greece-State. It’s obviously a collective oversight since Israel-Greece dates from 3-4K years whereas the originary civilizations date from 10-6K years ago. It still baffles me how it could be missed other than plain Eurocentric prejudice since the arithmetic is elementary grade. Be what it may, the genealogy of humanity skips the grandparents and starts counting with mom and dad. It is much more manageable since dealing with beginnings poses the chicken-&-egg challenge, whereas starting with the chicken and egg farm is far more convenient.
The question surges regarding the synergy between a humanist and an atheist organization. In practice it is not uncommon for civic organizations to partner in the interest of lowering costs or publicizing their activity. However, beyond practical considerations, at issue is a deeper question. Not between atheism and humanism, but rather between theism and humanism, which stand to each other as church and state. The consensus is to keep them separate lest they shortcircuit. But the practical and the theoretical don’t disappear and instead are front and center if we consider the question as a bucket partially full or partially empty. That is, full if theism or humanism, and empty if atheism and ahumanism. The question can no longer be avoided as to how to integrate humanism and theism.
The graphical image employed for clarity is a pair of water buckets floating in a pool of water. The two water buckets representing the partial views of Israel-Church and Greece-State and the pool of water the OSC of originary civilization. Thus, the buckets share their water content but they are no longer viewed as standing on firm ground, but rather begging the question of the greater pool of water sustaining them for foundation. The reason the OSC is hard to accept is the same that the pool doesn’t fit in the water bucket.
My take on why the thinkers missed the primeval cradle altogether, but which was never missing, is no different than the greater quest of why the OSC was missed but was never missing. Overall, our lack of understanding of the Big Bang of the universe somehow reflected unto the Butterfly Ripple of Peace. Our lack of one foreshadowed misunderstanding the other. Essentially, they’re just the flip sides of the same coin. (Cuando las barbas de tu vecino veas afeitar, pon las tuyas a remojar.)
To get a sense of proportion and comparison, let’s take the case of physical reality. Walk out of the house and what does one see? Leaves falling, cars on the streets, birds flying, and so on. Things do as they must, subject to the laws that govern them. This seems to say that discovery is not that different from revelation. After a deep breath, one reckons that things are complex yet boil down to Newton’s law of universal gravitation (Fg=Gm1m2/r2) and generically of Force equals mass times acceleration (Fi=ma), and that they’re equal (Fi=Fg). Of course, things have move on beyond classical physics, but the idea remains that things are governed by universal principles. Furthermore, that these principles are abstractions from the reality of things. The clue is pasting the one letter of Hebrew to the first word of Creation as in Genesis 1:1a/Alef, with a slash to both separate as join much like the rim of a coin.
Just like one can get lost with numbers, likewise, can one get lost with letters. That is, our lack of capturing the gist of things is the problem. This is where formulas or axioms can come to the rescue to sift through pales of hay. Like finding the essence of things in Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli and in Alef / BeReshIth, as PRD/S and S/DRP as OSC residue, instead of an encyclopedia of erudition. In other words, the PaRaDi/Se formula captures the very essence of the message, Alef / BeReshIth for Israel and Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli for Mesoamerica.
Later came the Big Bang theory and the CMB (Cosmic Microwave Background) as its afterglow residue. Well, something similar occurs with human reality. Not even with AI could anyone manage the formidable task of understanding originary civilizations, yet there must be a simple formula to express its essence. It’s the OSC postulate of the Butterfly Ripple of humanity and its verifiable residue in Mesoamerica with PRD/SXóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli and of First (1st) Derivative Israel with S/DRP of Alef / BeReshIth.
The cradle of the West has Israel and Greece, with the Torah and humanism of mono-dualism, respectively. The question is whom does the cradle of the World have, and what is it? The cradle of the World has Mesoamerica and contains uni/triadism. Israel’s primeval kabbalah in formula is S/DRP, and it’s taught by way of stories in the Torah Teaching (תוֹרָה). Mesoamerica’s formula of Toltecáyotl is PRD/S and was passed on by creativity and poetry, as alluded to in the codices.
One final note on Eurocentrism. The problem is seeing the cradle of civilization as Israel-Church Greece-State is roughly right, but out of habit favors substituting the West for the World. No small matter, being the case that we’re animals of habit.
The bias of the Olde World of East and West of the four (4) originary civilizations, till the coin developed the rim of the interstice of the Americas in Mesoamerica and Andean, for a grand total of six (6). The problem with the East-&-West point of view is the the world is just as broken as solely with the West or East separately. The skyscraper syndrome turned into labyrinth is not finding an entry-level for the homeless sleeping on street benches or for the foot dweller searching for a roof.
The OSC was lost in the East of India and China in the sense of its losing sight of its cornerstone on account of such high rise dwellings. Lost or misplaced or forgotten, laying deep next above the mother rock. The biases are West and East, and East-West omitting the rim altogether of the Americas interstice. By fortune or luck or accident but the OSC was preserved in the Americas by not losing the entry-level while erecting the skyscraper. At least not completely with most going underneath but the vital 1% staying afloat. At the time of the Conquest Mesoamerica was a frozen picture of the world of originary times.
No power tools to mention such as bronze never mind iron solely stone, nor written solely oral tradition, and no bulls to pull never mind the wheel solely what a person can carry. Corruption set in as the machine of progress took over. What better proof of losing the OSC than our broken world in spite of all the great teachings. Their own construction ended by mining their edifice. East and West fell victim of their own success. “No hay mal que por bien no venga”, but also “No hay bien que por mal no venga”. Or else there’s an upside to every downside. This seems to be a classic case of creativity in the interstice Americas and productivity in the East-&-West. Something like self-reliance over machine dependence. On the long haul, it will catchup on us.
Advocating for the advent of the new era of the Cosmovision Age of Peace requires putting feet to words to thread the path. It’s not about helping anybody, who’s anyone anyway, but about everybody doing their part in helping others. About sharing along with their own load of interests. No issues approach, not endorsing mono-dualism of feeding the preying parties, rather advocating for the PaRaDi/Se Principle compliance norm of the OSC. Once one becomes acquainted with uni/triadism, sufficiently knowing it and can confidently apply to resolve problems, then one can decide thereafter on one’s own. The idea is to combine advocating for the Cosmovision Age of Peace all the while optional promoting one’s faith. That is, as applications of the theory regarding societal service or of just society, to distinguish it from social justice of mono-dualism of the parties taking turns at the spoils. It’s about going about knocking at doors, stopping passersby, speaking at events, and in general sharing the good tidings.
Let’s take stock of the idea of a standard model of reason in abstract terms being the case that logic-&-sets is the language of nature. But, where to go for the key concept? The working hypothesis is to go to the beginning with the first word of ex nihilo Creation BeReshIth InBeginningOf (בְּ-רֵאשִׁ֖-ית), preceded by the one letter of the Creator Alef A (א), namely, Alef/BeReshIth A/InBeginningOf (א/בְּ-רֵאשִׁ֖-ית). For the sake of expediency, we’ll proceed with the formulaic presentation relying on the universal principle of knowledge. Essentially, it’s Alef–S / Be–DResh–RIth–P(A-S / In-D Beginning-R Of-P), with the slash-/ as S holy-/-profane DRP, as S/DRP. Neatly, the OS as the Universal Principle of Knowledge is “theone whole is and becomes triad parts”, or else in acronym formula as PaRaDi/Se. This would then be as One whole–Sis-/-becomesTriad Parts–DRP. Alternatively, the parts as triad integrate as one whole, or else the one whole disintegrates into triad parts.
Israel is First (1st) Derivative out of the originary civilizations of the Fertile Crescent. Its claim is that S/DRP (פרד/ס) is the case. By the look of things, the residue of the OS in these two originary civilizations was somehow lost, but bear in mind that lack of evidence is not proof of absence. In any case, out of this evolved the PaRDeS Medieval dark kabbalah in the Middle Ages based on the whole TaNaKh, of Pentateuch, Prophets, and Writings. And of recent invoicing as developed by the author arose the PaRaDi/Se Primeval bright kabbalah based solely on Genesis 1:1a/Alef. This is constituted out of the first letter of Hebrew Alef A (א) and the first word of the Torah BeReshIth InBeginningOf (בְּ-רֵאשִׁ֖-ית), as if to say Creator-S creative-/-creature Creation-DRP, to make Alef/BeReshIth A/InBeginningOf (א/בְּ-רֵאשִׁ֖-ית). Moses’ is deductive as S/DRP, Elohim-S covert-/-overt Humanity-DRP, Spiritual-D Mental-R Physical-P.
The validation of Moses’ kabbalah of Alef/BeReshIth (A/InBeginningOf) came from the least likely source of Mesoamerica’s Toltecáyotl of Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli (Flower-P Song-D / Yoliztli-S). The creative process was Admiration-P Exaltation-D, Reflection-R, Wonder-PRD, Contemplation-/-Revelation as creature-/-creative, and then unto Life or Giver of Life-S. Similarly, but unique, is the illustrative case of Moses in the Burning bush-P Exaltation-D, Reflection-R, Contemplation-/-Revelation, Ehyeh I will be(אֶֽהְיֶ֖ה)-S. That is, Moses learned about the Creator by PRD/S, then turned it into the Torah Teaching (תוֹרָה) as S/DRP, with hard to find traces in the text of PRD/S. It seems that his lesson codes as Creator {_}-S YHVH-/-Elohim, Creation-DRP, Creative-D Cosmos-R Creature-P.
In other words, Moses’ Alef / BeReshIth reads PaRaDi/Se right to left S/DRP as revelation from Heaven above, whereas Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli reads it left to right PRD/S as creativity from Earth below. In other words, Israel’s is deductive starting off from Creator-S, then Creation-DRP, and inbetween humanity-/. Whereas Mesoamerica’s is inductive starting with beauty-P, exaltation-D, reflection-R, contemplation-/-transcendence, unto Life-S. Israel’s is about the Creator and human obedience to its six-hundred thirteen (613) ordinary commandments, whereas Mesoamerica’s is about life, human creativity on the earth, and solely the One (1) unique Commandment. This Nahuatl originary civilization of Mesoamerica contributed Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli (Flower Song / Life) as well as the equivalent Ixtli Áyotl / Yoliztli (Face Heart / Life). Simplistically, Theism-S/PRD and Humanism-PRD/S. Theism as S/DRP and humanism as PRD/S. Or else, simply joint as Theism/Humanism of S/DRP, or just as well as Humanism/Theism PRD/S. But the teacher in me shouts that S/DRP is teaching while PRD/S is learning!
With Moses’ take as the residue of the residue of OS, we can now go back to better understand the residue of the OS of Toltecáyotl of PRD/S. But retrospectively as well validate Moses’ S/DRP. Were it not for Israel’s First (1st) Derivative of Mesopotamia and Egypt, we would just consider Toltecáyotl of Xóchitl–PCuícatl–D / Yoliztli–S as difrasism metaphor poetry or as metaphysics discourse. As a sort of cosmovision understood as pre-rational thinking just past mythology, instead of the headwaters of religion, philosophy, and science all in one before the shattering of the triad into three separate shards of dualism as is the case today. Now as of today there are two versions of what cosmovision signifies. Previously, as undifferentiated knowledge, much like a child before schooling, and now as whole knowledge before being broken up into three distinct shards, precisely by schooling!
We’re before an apparently unsolvable riddle, half enigma and half conundrum. We either give up or else trash it and start afresh so as to enliven our exhausted civilization. This is similar to the historical case of Alexander the Great and his encounter with the Gordian Knot. Instead of wasting time trying to untie the knot by hand, an impossible feat, he simply used his sword to cut it in half and went on to fulfil his global mission of Hellenization.
But what is this OS? Solely by standing on the shoulders of Moses’ primeval kabbalah of PaRaDi/Se, and then seeing things through his eyes, can one understand that the originary of Mesoamerica and the First (1st) Derivative of Israeli are mirror images of each other. Only then does the evidence become apparent that in the difrasism Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli (Flower Song / Life) we have Xóchitl-P Cuícatl-D / Yoliztli-S, or else Ixtli-P Áyotl-D / Yoliztli-S(Face Heart / Life).The sequence is P_D, R, /, S, to become PRD/S. This inductive Nahuatl PRD/S of Toltecáyotl contrasts as its mirror image to the deductive Hebrew kabbalah S/DRP of Moses.
Now back to Israel. The One (1) imperative commandment is to be creative, as YHVH is Creator. It debunks the traditional one of “obey and pray”, and inaugurates active creativity of postravism, thus ending the rule of the elite erudite and replacing it with the Am Haaretz people of the land. The six-hundred thirteen (613) ordinary commandments were to be submissive, with YHVH as Commander. Overall, the introduction of the One (1) commandment requires reinterpretation in translation of the whole Torah in light of recovery of the PaRaDi/Se Principle as contiguous residue to the OS. Creativity as cosmovision is more about good anarchy than about right dictatorship. Anarchy is good anarchy if founded on OSC, and anarchy is bad anarchy if unsoundly founded.
All things considered, perhaps, theisticpeoplewould tend to identify more so with S/DRP of Creator/Obedience, whereas the humanistic more so with PRD/S of Creative/Life. Under this two-way street design, the CBI Ripple would enhance the interpretation of Moses’ Torah and in no way diminish it. The Cosmic Option is the spark to kindle humane civilization. It’s the only viable way forward. Anything short of this are failed half-way measures designed to burn the time we don’t have to begin with.
We have two candidates to work with. Mesoamerica as originary civilization with the residue of the OS, and Israel as First (1st) Derivative of the originary civilizations of Mesopotamia and Egypt. These last two somehow lost the OS along the way. This would make Israel twice removed from the OS, or else as residue of the residue of the OS. Thus, Mesoamerica can serve to validate Israel as well as Israel can serve to clarify Mesoamerica. The thing is to tap the source to make the right connections. Neither atheism nor humanism are free standing, as if founded on Israel and Greece, but are dependent on what came before.
The question is if there’s a single principle unifying humanism and theism. Yes, it’s found in the difrasism of Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli (Flower Song / Life), or equally Ixtli Áyotl / Yoliztli (Face Heart / Life), of the originary civilization of Mesoamerica. That this is the case is due to the fact that this originary civilization in America had been cut off from the other three (3) in Asia and one (1) in Africa for over 25K years due to the thawing of the Bering Strait. Today, under the reign of dualism, we have humanism in classical Greece and theism in biblical Israel. Solely cosmovision can bring the ends together under one universal principle of knowledge.
Now Israel as First (1st) Derivative. We shouldn’t lose sight of the One (1) unique Commandment of freelance creativity on account of the six-hundred thirteen (613) ordinary commandments of the obedience tradition. Let’s take stock of the idea of a standard model of reason in abstract terms. Succinctly, just do the gematria math to convince yourself: 613 => 6 + 1 + 3 = 10 => 1 + 0 = 1!
Where to go? Where to if not at the beginning with the first word of Creation, preceded by the one letter of the Creator, namely, Alef/BeReshIth InBeginningOf (א/בְּ-רֵאשִׁ֖-ית). That is, for the sake of economy, in formulaic presentation relying on the universal principle of knowledge. There’s the First (1st) Derivative PaRaDi/Se primeval kabbalah out of the first letter of Hebrew Alef A (א) and the first word of Genesis of BeReshIth InBeginningOf (בְּ-רֵאשִׁ֖-ית), to make Alef/BeReshIth A/InBeginningOf (א/בְּ-רֵאשִׁ֖-ית), as Genesis 1:1a/Alef. Moses understood it deductively as S/DRP, Elohim-S covert-/-overt Humanity-DRP, Spiritual-D Mental-R Physical-P.
The confirmation of Moses’ kabbalah came from Mesoamerica’s Toltecáyotl of the difrasism Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli (Flower Song / Life). This was inductive as Flower-P Song-D, Reflection-R, Contemplation-PRD, Transcendence-/ as creature-/-creative then unto Life or Giver of Life-S. That is, Moses’ Alef / BeReshIth reads PaRaDi/Se right to left S/DRP as revelation from Heaven above, whereas Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli reads it left to right PRD/S as active creativity from Earth below.
So, we need to go to the point/origin of civilization for the Originary Sign (OS). The solution comes from the least likely of places, from the Americas! We’ll leave India and China aside without loss of generality since their influence remained localized and focus instead solely on Mesoamerica.
Fortunately, we can go to the point/origin in the Americas which were isolated from the other four (4) originary civilizations. These two (2) originary civilizations were Mesoamerica and Andean. We’ll leave the Andean on pause for the moment till further study and focus on Mesoamerica as the sole possible surviving source of the OS.
More precisely, the secret Originary Sign is beyond reach but what is within our scope of knowledge is the residue of the OS. This will serve to confirm or refute the twice removed OS residue of Israel. Though culture was passed on from Olmec to Mayan to Nahuatl, it’s still one originary civilization. Not two like the case of Israel as First (1st) Derivative civilization out of the two distinct originary civilizations of Mesopotamia & Egypt. If Israel had been one of the originary civilization, there would be no need to verify its authenticity as residue of the OS.
We’ll proceed as history, of seeing the Pentateuch of Moses as document not as religion. On the one hand, we have that Abraham’s father Terah lived in Ur of the Chaldeans in Babylon, and then moved his family to Haran, both in Mesopotamia today Iraq, before Abraham’s moving on to the land of Canaan. On the other hand, Joseph son of Jacob also called Israel was the viceroy under Pharoah and was imbued in the traditions of Egypt as mentioned regarding the silver cup which he used for divination. Not to mention that Moses grew up in the house of Pharoah. This plus the fact that the stay of the Children of Israel in the land of Egypt was for four hundred (400) years. Though there’s no evidence of such a sojourn, recall that lack of evidence is not proof of absence. The point being that Israel is First (1st) Derivative of the originary civilizations of Mesopotamia and Egypt, which would then make Greece Second (2nd) Derivative of these two as well as of Israel. This would then make the West as Nth Derivative of sorts as in a Fourier series of power derivatives.
Please note that herein nothing is being invented. It simply discovers what others seem to have overlooked. Nothing is missing just missed, recovered, connected the dots to make sense as narrative. However, what’s worth noting is that it’s always a win-lose endeavor. One can never get a win-win out of mono-dualism. Examples abound on the Internet. “If I invite so and so, my wife will be angry, and if I don’t, I will lose the friendship of so and so”.
But let’s back up a little to the cradles to make sense of things. People in knowledgeable circles obviously knew about it, that the Originary Civilizations came before Greece, and that Israel came before Greece as well. Meaning that the cradle of the World preceded the cradle of the West by a millennia. Yet, they didn’t know what to make of it. My guess from my limited perspective is that they saw what came out of the Originary Civilizations as mythology. Sort of a continuation of cave dwellers and later gatherer hunters who somehow practiced magic of sorts on the cave images to improve their preying on live food.
This takes us to the idea of cosmovision, the magic, the transitional, and the holistic, for lack of a better description. The first was that of incantations in cave dwelling of undifferentiated reality. The second I would exemplify with the preSocratic thinkers who somehow transitioned between this cosmovision 1.0 principle and philosophy proper. Take the case of Thales of Miletus who thought of water as the first principle, Anaximenes with air, Heraclitus with fire, and later followed by Empedocles who combined the four elements, and finally Democritus with atoms. All these served as stepping stones for the School of Athens of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle of philosophy proper, and so on.
As a quick digression we could add Aristotle’s four causes as Final cause of End or purpose-S being-/-becoming Efficient cause or agent-D Formal cause of form or essence-R Material cause of matter-P. Likewise, Plato’s four levels of reality as Knowledge (noesis)-S / Thought (dianoia)-D Confidence (pistis)-R Conjecture (eikasia)-P, or else his four virtues as Prudence-S / Justice-D Fortitude-R Temperance-P.
Fast forward, we arrive at cosmovision 2.0, but not as incantation nor as the four elements, but more as neo-holism. By this holism is meant that “the one whole is and becomes triad parts”, or as uni/triadism. This is the core notion expressed as PaRaDi/Se Originary Sign Cosmovision. Recall that Moses’ Alef/BeReshIth A/InBeginningOf is deductive as S/DRP, Elohim-S covert-/-overt Humanity-DRP, Spiritual-D Mental-R Physical-P. Whereas Toltecáyotl understands it inductively as Xóchitl Flower-P (_)-RCuícatl Song-P, / Yoliztli Life-S, with the space (_) meant having activity-/-creativity.
What may seem trivial isn’t. That is, cosmovision consists in abstraction from manifest reality to subjacent ideality. Cosmovision writing is non-fiction understood as not differentiating between religion, philosophy, and science; rather taking them as integral parts of a triad of the anarchy epoch before shattered into three separate and distinct pieces of knowledge in civilization. Case in point, the postulate in Genesis 1:1a/Alef as thePaRaDi/Se Principle is further backed up in Proverbs 8:22 et al as the Originary Sign Cosmovision when referring to “Wisdom” existing previous to Creation.
The easiest way to explain the jump from the manifest to the abstract is by comparison with physics regarding the physical. The classical example is Newtonian physics of the law of forces and specifically of universal gravitation to account for behavior of all things physical as in space and time having mass. That is, Force equals mass times acceleration (F=ma), and Gravitational Force equals affected masses divided by square of distance multiplied by a constant (F=GmM/r2). Same idea applies here with OSC, all proportions kept, but now with the S/DRP and PRD/S. The Cosmovision Age of Peace can be compacted as Age of Peace-S / OSC-DRP, Cosmovision-D Sign-R Originary-P.
Let’s be consequent. If the Torah is the word of God, that certainly makes Israel unique. That is, Israel is the microcosm of the world such that to understand Israel one would need the world picture, and to understand the world one would need to understand the role of Israel. No other nation can claim to have given the world the word of God, as Revelation of the Torah to Moses.
Thus, the conflict in the Middle East is unique because Israel is microcosm. On the other hand, the war in Ukraine with Russia is just another conflict between two ordinary nations over territory and hegemony. Same goes for the other wars like WWI or WWII, and so on. Solely the Middle East is unique on account of the Revelation of the Torah to Moses for Israel to share with the world. But whether Israel is the microcosm or ordinary is just the beginning. It merely sets the stage for the performance to follow.
This can be the clarity needed in a half-lit self-contradictory ambiance, otherwise it’s part of the problem not the solution. You can’t have it both ways with Israel as unique nation and as ordinary nation. This absurdity can only be resolved with a new understanding of things, and certainly not within Enlightenment Age ideas. This would require the Cosmovision Age of Peace to say the least. There is worldwide consensus that Israel is the Holy land. No other nation is held to this special status. There’s the parallel case of the Tribe of Levi of the Children of Israel which didn’t inherit land on account that they had the Torah.
To unravel the above, we have two candidates to work with. Solely Mesoamerica as originary civilization with the residue of the OS, and Israel as First (1st) Derivative of the originary civilizations of Mesopotamia and Egypt. These last two somehow lost the OS along the way. In any case, this would then make Israel twice removed from the OS, or as residue of the residue of the OS. Thus, Mesoamerica can serve to validate Israel as well as for Israel to serve to clarify things regarding Mesoamerica.
The question is if there’s a single principle unifying humanism and theism. Yes, in the difrasism of Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli (Flower Song / Life), or equally Ixtli Áyotl / Yoliztli (Face Heart / Life) of the originary civilization of Mesoamerica. That this is the case is due to the fact that this originary civilization in America had been cut off from the other three (3) in Asia and one (1) in Africa for over 25K years. Today, under the reign of mono-dualism, we have humanism in classical Greece and theism in biblical Israel. Solely cosmovision can bring the ends together under one universal principle of knowledge as uni/triadism.
Now to Israel as First (1st) Derivative. We don’t want to lose sight of the creative One (1) commandment on account of the six-hundred thirteen (613) commandments of the obedience tradition. Succinctly, just do the gematria math to convince yourself: 613=>6+1+3=10=>1+0=1! Let’s take stock of the idea of a standard model of reason in abstract terms.
Where to go? Where to but to the beginning with the first word of Creation, preceded by the one letter of the Creator, namely, Alef/BeReshIth InBeginningOf (א/בְּ-רֵאשִׁ֖-ית). For the sake of economy, we’ll rely on the formulaic presentation of PaRaDi/Se of the universal principle of knowledge. There’s the First (1st) Derivative primeval kabbalah out of the first letter of Hebrew Alef A (א) and the first word of Genesis BeReshIth InBeginningOf (בְּ-רֵאשִׁ֖-ית), to make Alef/BeReshIth A/InBeginningOf (א/בְּ-רֵאשִׁ֖-ית). Moses understood it deductively as S/DRP, Elohim-S covert-/-overt Humanity-DRP, Spiritual-D Mental-R Physical-P.
The confirmation of Moses’ kabbalah came from Mesoamerica’s Toltecáyotl of Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli (Flower Song / Life). This was deductive as Flower-P Song-D, Reflection-R, Contemplation-PRD, Transcendence-/ as creature-/-creative then unto Life or Giver of Life-S. That is, Moses’ Alef / BeReshIth reads PaRaDi/Se right to left S/DRP as revelation from Heaven above, whereas Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli reads it left to right PRD/S as creativity from Earth below.
By convention is seems to make sense to call the former Israel’s theism, but how to call the latter? Mexoamerica’s humanism. But bear in mind that they’re actually mirror images of each other. That is, theism and humanism thus pristinely understood as flipsides of the same coin. By the way, Mesoamerica and Mexoamerica seem to be used interchangeably, in part the former so as to avoid confusing with Mesopotamia, and the latter on account of its coincidence with the modern day nation state of Mexico, plus the fact that they differ by one similarly sounding letter. In other words, Mexoamerica is Mesoamerica plus Mexico.
Is Tikkun Olam compatible with theism-humanism separation, or of heaven-earth by the rakía, as if a rimless coin of sorts? Or are they just flipsides? And if so, then how to make the rimful connection between theism and humanism? Another way to express all this is Israel’s theism Alef / BeReshIth A/InBeginningOf of obedience as S/DRP and-/ Mesoamerica’s humanism Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli Flower Song / Life of creativity as PRD/S, and jointly as the PaRaDi/Se principle.
Religion of yore was about preparing for the afterlife, as in the double-tiered world of mono-dualism. Not anymore since uni/triadism. There’s nothing beyond which isn’t found herein if you know where to look. In a nutshell, Israel’s S/DRP spells God/obedience, and Mesoamerica’s PRD/S spells creativity/Life.
Let’s take it from the top and work our way downwards. What is the problem with monism theology as monotheism? What’s the problem with dualism humanism as duohumanism? What we have today is Monotheism-duohumanism. If only one entity held its point, it would make the world change its spin and course.
But is Israel’s monotheism due on account of being First (1st) Derivative, or is it a bounce back from Second (2nd) Derivative Greece by way of the NT? Monism theology as monotheism occupies all and leaves no room for humanism. The only room left for humanism is a subservient role, hence the six-hundred thirteen (613) commandments to obey. It’s exclusive.
What happens is that the NT is a graft of Greece on the trunk of Israel. But also, that the OT is not old enough compared to the originary civilizations. A picture of Judaism in its origins is of an oral tradition society under cosmovision of storytelling. This compares with the NT which is heir to the written narrative of Plato’s dialogues and Aristotle’s treatises.
Let’s start by finding the core of Israel to settle matters. It consists in joining the first letter of Hebrew Alef A (א) to the first word of the Torah BeReshIth InBeginningOf (בְּ-רֵאשִׁ֖-ית) as Alef/BeReshIth A/InBeginningOf (א/בְּ-רֵאשִׁ֖-ית). We call Alef God but don’t know what it is. It comes across as Secret-S and leave it at that. Let’s take the case of Elohim Powers (אֱלֹהִים). The name ’El God (אֱלֹ) with him plural (הִים) with due allowance of vowels and consonants for sounding and grammar. It can also be understood as Power of powers, or God of gods, as Powers or as Gods, as so understood.
Greece’s dualism as duohumanism makes separate rooms for each. It’s inclusive. Sort of separate and equal. Seemingly, missing the S, and somehow the slash-/ is duplicated alongside the middle term R as P /R/ D.
Now let’s follow up by finding the core of Mesoamerica. It is inductive and consists in Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli (Flower Song / Life) as Flower-P Song-D, Reflection-R, Contemplation-PRD, Transcendence-/ as creature-/-creative then unto Life or Giver of Life-S. That is, the PRD/S of Mesoamerica, vis-à-vis the S/DRP of Israel. Then if separated or if joined, rim both separates as joins the sides of the coin.
But what can be said about mono-dualism? That mono-dualism is wrong. For starts, there is room for humanism in theism since the feeling exists. We cannot ignore it since it is experienced. Maybe I do, maybe I don’t; maybe you do, maybe you don’t. But suffice that one exists to proof that it is the case. The quest is how to get past Mono-dualism and unto Uni/triadism. Where and when? Back in time to the originary civilizations for the OS!
Imagine a situation where a person on the opposite midpoint of a circle delivers a message to a neighbor on its right and left. After a while the message reaches the person on the near side of the circle. Let’s assume that two different versions reach. The receptor then tries to ascertain the veracity of the claims by retracing the flows back though the left as well as through the right till it gets to the source person of the message. Well, something along the same lines applies here regarding how to ascertain the veracity of the residue of the OS of the First (1st) Derivative. If it is authentic derived from the direct residue of the OS or is foreign to it.
Now a word on the Andean. Is it that we know more or there is more to know due to Cortés of Mesoamerica over Pizarro of Andean. Cortés send for twelve Franciscan monks to know and evangelize the population. Maybe Pizarro didn’t. Or maybe the situations were entirely different. Be it what it may, we or at least I know more about the cosmovision of Mesoamerica than Andean.
By Andean originary civilization is meant roughly from southern Columbia, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, down to northern Chile, and western Amazon region possibly including Brazil. Certainly, centered in Peru. What one identifies as Aztec and Mayan of Mesoamerica, actually come at the end of a long stretch of thousands of years, and the same applies to the Incas of the Andean. By Mesoamerica is understood central and southern Mexico, Guatemala, and northern Central America. However, by extension roughly speaking it includes the USA and Canada.
Now unto the literal interpretation of scripture. The problem isn’t in the texts, but in the mindset of the reading. Of mentalism or mindism per se leaving by the wayside the spiritual and the physical of the triad Human-DRP, Spiritual-D Mental-R Physical-P. This is but a rephrasing that mono-dualism is at the mind taking over the heart in modernity, in place of the uni/triadism. There’s nothing wrong with the content of the text, it’s the reason employed in signification.
There was sacrifice as worship up to the destruction of the Second Temple in Jerusalem. Afterwards Ravism came up with prayer to replace sacrifice. The question now is with what to continue on this next phase with the coming into scene of the OS. Prayer made perfect sense within the context of a dictating Creator and a subservient human receiving six-hundred thirteen (613) commandments of well behavior. But now with the advent of the One (1) commandment of be creative, what would be the accommodation?
My first guess would be something along the inductive lines of meditation, wonder, or contemplation in accordance with PRD/S as with Xóchitl–PCuícatl–D / Yoliztli-S and less so along those of deductive prayer of ’Ehyeh I will be (אֶֽהְיֶה) of S/DRP, with Alef–S / Heh-D Vav-R Heh-P, as Creator-S / Creation-DRP. Or simply as ’El Power (אֵל) Alef–S / Lamed Teaching-DRP. Ultimately one road leads to whereas the other road leads from.
One as S/DRP is as beseeching a master, whereas the other PRD/S is seeking orientation by plain listening. By this is meant the state of voidness, as in vacuousness, as in ex nihilo, as in nothingness as the source of everything, as in the point/origin. Listenness was triad, as the state or quality of listening, but it doesn’t exist, so listening will have to do.
The old norm is “pray and obey”. Prayers made by ravism and obeying referred to the six-hundred thirteen (613) commandments in the Torah. The new is simply “be actively creative”. Mono-dualism as ravism Judaism-Mono with scholar Humanism-Dualism.
Are we all for change so long as it’s confined to the world to come? Feeling cool, calm and collected as good tikkunists? We’re living in the XXI century, and should we be projecting back to the XIX and XX centuries of the II millennium, or forward to the XXII century of the III millennium? That is, was it Reform or is it Reform? Is Reform a one-off thing or is it ongoing?
CBI is Reform Judaism. The question pending like Damocles’ sword over its heads is whether reform is a one-off event or if it is of a continuous nature. Is it similar to a photo or a video? Is it a picture of Reform movement next to Orthodoxy in Germany 1810, or is it an ongoing endeavor as said by Mordechai Kaplan author of “Judaism as a civilization, towards a reconstruction of American-Jewish life” (1934)? Kaplan went on to found Reconstructionist Judaism as well as the Jewish Center which merged religious, cultural and community life. CBI is part of the progressive triad of Reform, Reconstructionist, and Renewal Jewish movement.
If it’s a cause it will continuously generate a movement. Change is catalyzed where one least expects it, from flat newcomers, from hyperbolic outsiders, or from spherical recyclers. What comes next after a two-hundred plus year hiatus? This is reminiscent of the notion of quantitative accumulation giving rise to qualitative change, historical quantum leap of sorts. It’s time for long overdue changes since its inception in Germany back in the 19th century and later adjustments in 20th USA.
The Torah is eternal not allowing changing text nor leaning right or left in interpretation. But Judaism is not unchangeable, allowing margin for interpretation in translation from biblical Hebrew. There’s a spectrum ranging from ultra-orthodox to infra-reform, as in Hasidic, Chabad, Conservative, Reform, Reconstruction, Renewal, the Secular, and so on beyond my knowledge. The former was withing ravism while the latter is from without.
So that nobody misses the gist. It’s the XXII century of the III millennium. We’re still thinking in terms of XX century stuff when in today’s XXI we ought to be projecting the XXII century of the III millennium. The clock doesn’t keep time counterclockwise.
We’re caught between a rock and a hard place of the Old Guard and New Guard. We need to view beyond the horizon and landscape as if with drone eyes. The windshield view is fine for the closeup distant seeing, and the rearview for maneuvering in tight spots. Our far-off future lies in the remote past, in the originary civilization of Mesoamerica.
It’s like solving a problem that doesn’t exist. Analysis of problems are distinctions which don’t make a difference in solving them. If you can’t beat them, lead them with people fighting for Justice/justice. Corruption comes from the advice given by Kohelet of enjoyment all you can for life is brief.
Unitheism. Triadhumanism. Uni/triad. Theism/humanism. No more monotheism-duohumanism of First (1st) Derivative Israel and Second (2nd) D Greece, but of the residue of the OS in the originary civilizations. There are two approaches: of grassroots from below and of sky high from above, or issues and principles, respectively. But we live on the surface of the earth, we’re not birds or worms, mother nature teaches that we need conjugating the approaches much like a braid. Mono-dualism leads to absurdity on the road to totalitarianism of bad anarchy. Uni/triadism leads to making sense and to good anarchy, just as there’s good cholesterol and there’s bad cholesterol.
If there are laws in science which apply universally, like Newton’s law of universal gravitation, why aren’t there any in the humanities? There are, just that we haven’t taken the trouble of adequately formulating them. It all got started with kabbalah, but we’ll leave that story to my 2018 book, and instead jump straight into the toolbox to work on Justice/justice. After all, the proof of the theory is in its applications.
Not only does Mesoamerica’s Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli (Flower Song / Life) validate Moses’ Alef/BeReshIth (A/InBeginningOf) as authentic PaRaDi/Se residue of the OS, but additionally enhances it by going past the six-hundred thirteen (613) secondary commandments of prayer and obedience and recovering the one (1) common sense imperative Commandment of creative activity and active creativity! What this means is that we now have a cosmovision accessible to all from whence to derive applications to resolve practical problems instead of having to rely on authority which is placing factors by hand. The problem with placing things by hand is that it depends on whose hand it is. There’s also the concern if the glove hides a bot. It’s best if guided by principle derived from the OS. The idea of the OS is that if all that’s known were lost, this would be the seed crystal around which the lost would be found back.
Now why the name of the Cosmovision Age of Peace? Mostly because no more guesswork, hit and miss, no more hope, nor waiting. It’s about the joy of knowing what to do and why. Just taking it from the cradle of its beginning and its support from the vacuum. The joy of breaking loose of the chokehold on our necks by mono-dualism and the breathing freely of uni/triadism. The joy of getting it right after three thousand years of doing it wrong. At last, there’s the OSC standard model and no longer having to depend on whom one asks, with plenty of wiggle room for diversity. Namely, the Kabbayotlogy of PaRaDi/Se compliance.
Why is this a change of Era, and not just another chapter of Modernity, Postmodernity, or of the extended Age of Enlightenment? Once the headstone is changed, everything changes. It’s not about switching stones but replacing the cornerstone. Cases abound like in physics which opened new eras with Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity, they’re not just another advance amongst many. Same here, by going from the cradle of the West to the cradle of the World and discovering the OSC, or should we say recovering and enhancing it by added measure by confirming the contribution of Israel as First Derivative of the residue of the OSC. The use of radical paradigm shift could apply. The problem is that this changes just don’t fit even in postmodernity, let alone in modernity, hence the need to rename the age altogether.
Now as to how does Peace comes out of the PaRaDi/Se Principle. Humanity-S / Peace-DRP, Creativity-D Dialogue-R Activity-P. Well simply by doing the gematria of the word Shalom Peace (שָׁלוֹם). What is the case with Shalom Peace (שָׁלוֹם)? Hebrew as a triad root for the word. That is, Word whole-S / Root triad-DRP, 1st–D 2nd–R 3rd–P. In this case the root of Shalom Peace would be (שלם) consisting of the letters shin sh 300 (ש), lammed el 30 (ל), and mem em 40ם) , מ). Adding them up gives us 300+30+40=370 and with gematric summation 370 => 10 =>1! That’s why shalom peace comes across as well as the root for shalem whole as one (1). This equally applies to Shalem Whole (שָׁלֵם) as well as to the verb Leshalem to pay debt (לְשַׁלֵם). The idea is that owing something diminishes from wholeness.
In the end the placeholder name of the essay finally settled for Peace. The concern with Joy in its various formats as enjoyment was that it can be easily misunderstood with happiness. But from Kohelet we know that happiness is futile, that solely creative activity is fruitful. Or in more conventional terms, it’s the case that cumulative quantitative changes bring about a categorical qualitative change.
The suggestion is naming Israel’s Kabbalah plus Mesoamerica’s Áyotl plus Greece’s Logos as Kabbayotlogy. Up to and including the Age of Enlightenment reigned Mono-dualism, and henceforth with the Cosmovision Age of Peace it’s Uni/triadism. The problem is that we’re stuck in Modernity, past its ripeness of Postmodernity as an age of Absurdity of fake news and alternative facts. It time to turn the page or else remain trapped in a vicious time loop.
Why is the world just as broken in spite of so many teachings by sages? Like why is the sky dark at night? These questions don’t have an obvious answer. The sky has to do with the expansion of the universe, as for the earth’s brokenness, that has to do with not going to the cradle of the world in the originary civilizations, settling instead for the low hanging fruit of the cradle of the West in Greece and secondarily with Israel.
The idea is to combine the Second (2nd) Derivative of Greece’s logos (as in biology), with the First (1st) Derivative of Israel’s kabbalah, with the OS residue of Mesoamerica’s Toltecáyotl (Toltec’s insight). Something like OSC-S / Kabbayotlogy-DRP, Kabbalah-D Áyotl-R Logos-P.
Is reality alien to ideality? What about Tikkun Olam? The Cause/effects is Justice/justice. What does this entail? Precisely reformed Reform Judaism of ideality/reality as the interpretation of Justice/justice. In the context of the OS hypothesis herein developed it stands for Israel’s theology / Mexoamerica’s humanism. And regarding its application Justice/justice stands for Just-state / just-society, which simply means that to achieve a just society one needs to start with a just state. It all starts by challenging the premise of social justice. The just society modeled on principle is sound, whereas social justice as issues is unsound. Social justice is better than nothing, granted, but it’s far from being the best.
I follow the dictum of engaging with Holy story texts literally, and then struggle to figure out what it means. And the same goes with secular statements emanating from authority. Literally, the OT’s says Justice/justice pursue of principle and shouldn’t be interpreted as the NT’s Social-justice pursue of issues. The easy way of joining the bandwagon of the latter being mainstream requires no further sayings, it’s the former which requires an elaborate argument to make the case. Previously OT stood for Old Testament, but from now onwards it stands for Originary Testament as in OSC. Perhaps as OgT instead of OdT, for Originary and Old Testament, respectively. The NT remains unchanged as New Testament.
The OT of the “53i+” Just State stands for Justice/justice pursue, whereas the NT of “31a-” Unjust State stands for Social-justice pursue. There’s a fork on the road, which path to take. Is it a question of majority of votes or of reason. Is it an occasion to celebrate a discussion for the sake of heaven? And if so, should the Board of directors turn into Council of elders to audition the matter, in accordance with ancestral tradition? There’s nothing personal in this disjuncture, though there are persons advocating the contending positions. This “53i+” Just State won’t provide the ultimate just society, put relatively speaking to our generation, it’s the best available.
With the “31a-” Unjust State it’s a question of priority of issues, of what tops the list, is it Snap or not Snap, or vouchers or not vouchers. Essentially, what it’s doing is equating by dumbing down as in Justice/justice equals Social-Justice (J/j=Sj). In all this, bear in mind that the author as provider of means, is simple trying to bridge the high aims of the Board with the long means of achieving them. The mentioned topics of the leadership are relevancy, modeling, rebirth and the like of the state of things moving forward. The purpose is to replace old and antiquated reasoning with vanguard originary cosmovision.
The point in all this is to highlight that Justice/justice is not theory which translates in practice as Social-justice. They are not the thing to begin with, substantially differing as in 1st Derivative from the residue of the OS of the two originary civilizations of Egypt and Mesopotamia, and 2nd Derivative from the 1st D and background barbarian Europe, respectively. The fact that the OT’s position is 1st D twice removed residue is validated by the originary civilization of Mesoamerica as residue of the OSC. The NT’s position is further confused out of 3rd Derivative Eurocentrism.
The NT is of the Enlightenment Age, whereas the OT as OSC is of the Cosmovision Age of Peace.
Let’s convene on nomenclature that social justice stands for the Enlightenment Age approach whereas just society stands for the Peace Age approach, as herein developed via the 53i+ State Constitution. Social justice is correction to unjust state. Just society starts with a just state.
It’s going to take more than strong coffee to wake up from the Enlightenment slumber. The source of light can only be life, hence the Cosmovision Age of Peace.
This section harkens back to the image of two partially filled water buckets floating in a pool. The question now is how to synergize theism with humanism or how to synchronize church and state in benefit of society. Basically, this is the social justice project in a nutshell. How do you join two things otherwise kept separate? The buckets remain separate all the while sharing the water content. In this the myth is that the buckets stand on firm ground, which isn’t the case, rather, are floating on the OSC. While something is better than nothing, at best it’s a palliative. It’s a status quo gimmick of the state under the name of the church. That is, of social justice as heavenly charity.
On an international setting, peace in the Middle East isn’t about war or politics, but about making a sound assumption on the primeval cradle of originary civilization.
To move on to applications we have to start by stating the norm explicitly. The norm is that everything that is the case must be PaRaDi/Se compliant. The question is whether the “31a-” Enlightenment State is PaRaDi/Se compliant. And if not, then what does it take to make it compliant to the residue of the OS. The “53i+” Just State and the “31a-” Unjust State.
One run which often occurs is analysis of the problem. While it may serve a purpose, it doesn’t provide a solution. There are no solutions out there which aren’t one-sided, and in conflict with their opposite. This is the direct result of placing things by hand. That is, instead of derived from theory based on principle and experience.
In this Age of Information, since information is a human right, the News Media should then be an autonomous power of the state. In this Age of knowledge, since knowledge is a human right, the University should then be an autonomous power of the state. If it’s justice that’s doubly pursued as in Justice/justice, then the powers of the University and the News Media would shoulder the Justice Power. If the individual is of a triad nature composed of the spiritual, the mental, and the physical, then there should be three (3) votes per person. If voting is a universal human right, then infants (i) should have tutored suffrage. If women are still not equal to men, then they need empowerment. The plus (+) comes by added measure to our state.
Briefly, this would give us the “53i+” Peace constitution. This is composed of a 5-power state of 3 votes per person, of infant suffrage, plus (+) all other considerations which enhance democracy. Today what we have is the “31a-” Enlightenment constitution made of a 3-power state, 1 vote per person, adult suffrage, and minus (-) all others which diminishes democracy unto duocracy.
The “5-powers” comes from the subtriad of the Judicial-R 3rd power unfolding as subtriad University-Dr Judicial-Rr Media-Pr. Something like 53i+ Resh is a subspace of BeReshIth. The “3 votes per person” comes from the fact that the Individual-S / Person-DRP, Beliefs-D Values-R Interests-P. The “i” comes from infant suffrage tutored by its parents. The “plus (+)” comes from enhancing democracy by placing the admin of the budget under the University 5th power and elections under the Media 4th power. Transparency understood as concurrency not as past the event.
With the “31a-” model of the State, the three powers are not independent. Solely the Legislative-D and Executive-P are independent, with the Judicial-R depending on the other two powers. The only way of making the Judicial independent is by creating the Media 4th power and University 5th power to shoulder up the Judicial as University-Dr Judicial-Rr Media-Pr.
The gist of the matter of LGBGT+ sexuality is its connection with life. It happens to be the case that life is a mystery and by extension sexuality is an enigma. In the customary formulaic version, it would come across as Life-S covert-/-overt Sexuality-DRP, Female-D Mixed-R Male-P. This needs endless research, but to follow in the same language it’s all in unfolding the subtriads of the above catethos and hypothenuse of the main triad. Another way of expressing it is as Life-S creative covert-/-creature overt Sexuality-DRP, Love-D Friendship-R Sex-P.
However, at the practical level there are basically two ways of interpreting the Holy Book regarding this delicate matter. There’s the originalist and there’s the contextualist. Both have much to their credit. One says that things are literally set in the original document while the other claims that meaning depends on the cultural environment which is always ongoing. Much like language is ongoing and changes with the people speaking it. Translation is interpretation, whether from biblical Hebrew to modern Hebrew or to any other language.
My take is that it requires deep acquaintance with the subject matter. That said, it additionally requires knowing how to apply the formula to transition from the orbital view of mono-dualism to the cosmic view of uni/triadism.
Kabbayotlogy provides a tentative explanation of humanity insofar as we’re made in image and likeness of Elohim. We Beney Yisrael (בְּנֵ֣י יִשְׂרָאֵל) are sons and daughters and inbetweens of Israel. As those who struggle with Elohim and with humans and prevail. This proposes the acceptance of the spectrum of sexuality of male and female and inbetweens over therapy affirming bipolar male-female or polarizing roles. This comes across clearer in a gendered language like Spanish with ellos, ellas, elles, they are masculine, feminine and inbetweens or generics. Given that the Creator Elohim made us, surely knowing what was being done. The challenge is rather on us to understand the deep-seated thought causation. We’re like diamonds, precious stones with natural imperfections.
While the English word has a Germanic root, the Latin word for hope is spes, and the Greek is elpis. These roots are seen in related English words: (Internet)
Spes: This Latin root gives us words like “despair”, which comes from desperare—meaning “to be without hope” (de- + sperare).
Elpis: The Greek term is historically significant, notably in the story of Pandora’s Box, where elpis was the last thing remaining inside.
The word “hope” has Latin roots in sperare (“to wait”) and spes (“to hope”), which are associated with the concept of trusting that something positive will happen. The concept of hope relates to the expectation of a desired outcome or to the belief in a better future timewise.
But is that all there is to hope? Is that all that can be said about hope in this day and Cosmovision Age of Peace? Hope not. (The reason for the name change from joy to peace is that in the American USA context, it can be easily confused with fun.) The thing is that we have the breath of the Creator in us since the advent of time. This makes us into creative-/-creatures as missed but not missing link between the Creator and Creation, as in Creator-S creative-/-creature Creation-DRP, and so on. This makes the waiting of hope a question of when is the time ripe for the taking? Whenever we find in us this active creativity which is a distinction which makes all the difference in the world. It’s ready whenever we’re ready. Ultimately, hope was delegated by the Creator on our active creativity.
My guess is that the counting with the residue of the OS is a good place to start applications.
To the end of applications of the theory, let’s start by addressing the Elephant Trio in the living room humming to the tune of the State. Let’s focus on the State Constitution in the three cosmic hub nations of the USA, Israel, and Mexico. Each of these nations is unique in its own right and challenges. This being the case, we’ll proceed by presenting upfront the triad model of the State as derived from the PaRaDi/Se Principle, and then apply it separately to each individual case study. Though mentioned as separate case studies, they should be viewed as one generic case study. The thing is that instead of combating symptoms as aches we should be addressing the character of the malady afflicting civilization.
In this Age of Information, since information is a human right, the News Media should then be an autonomous power of the state. In this Age of knowledge, since knowledge is a human right, the University should then be an autonomous power of the state. If it’s justice that’s doubly pursued as Justice/justice, then the powers of the University and the Media would shoulder the Justice Power. If the individual is of a triad nature composed of the spiritual, the mental, and the physical, then there should be three (3) votes per person. If voting is a universal human right, then infants (i) should have tutored suffrage. If women are still not equal to men, then they need empowerment. Since kids are a biological extension of their mothers’, then infant suffrage is Women Suffrage too (2)!
In an ideal world, without political parties, radicalization, much less polarization, then one vote per person should suffice. But in the real world of mono-dualism there’s the need to have two votes just to pacify, neutralize the polarizing parties and not favoring either one, leaving the third one as the sole free vote. Doing the math this requires 3 votes/person. Going too far and not going far enough. If the slate of candidates is large, perhaps more than 3 votes/person would be recommended.
Allowing to explain to take out the guesswork out of this matter. While on the subject of parties, it’s fair to say that political parties have good things going for them, like right-leaning being business-friendly creates jobs, while left-leaning work-friendly spreads the wealth around. Or trickle down and the roots-up, respectively. I still don’t understand why politicians insist on making politics boring.
Briefly, this would give us the “53i+” State Constitution. This is composed of a 5-power state and 3 votes per person, of infant suffrage, plus (+) all other considerations which enhance democracy. At present what we have is the “31a-” Enlightenment constitution composed of a 3-power state, 1 vote per person, adult suffrage, and minus (-) all others which diminishes democracy unto duocracy.
Now to the homework application. Either transcend the Ages or else get trapped in a swinging pendulum which is harmonically oscillating between right and left, from extreme right to extreme left, momentarily passing the center point in endless to-&-fro. These are characterized by generalized crises upon crises all across the board.
The “5-powers” comes from the subtriad of the Judicial-R 3rd power unfolding as subtriad University-Dr Judicial-Rr Media-Pr. The “3 votes per person” comes from the fact that the Individual-S / Person-DRP, Beliefs-D Values-R Interests-P. The “i” comes from infant suffrage tutored by its parents. The “plus (+)” comes from enhancing democracy by placing the admin of the budget under the University 5th power and elections under the News Media 4th power.
It has the first and oldest constitution and is in much need of updating. The recommendation is to respond in kind to the attacks by the Government on the powerless University, News Media, and Civil Society.
In code, One Constitution-S / Triad State-DRP, of Legislative Power-D Judicial Power-R Executive Power-P, with subtriad of Judicial-R as University-Dr Judicial-Rr Media-Pr. Dualism turns democracy into duocracy, while solely uni/triadism can sustain democracy. In all cases, it’s opportune to strike it while it’s hot. (Que no hay mal que por bien no venga.) This would begin new knowledgeable and well informed young generations into the political arena as well as empower women through their children. All this is subject to consensus and enrichment reached in each sovereign nation.
With the two-party political system, the colorful infra-Reds and ultra-Blues of the spectrum are just taking turns at the spoils. They master dualism to such a degree that they convince everyone that one can have it and eat it too. Mono-dualism leads to absurdity on the road to totalitarianism of bad anarchy. Uni/triadism leads to making sense and to good anarchy. This follows just as there’s good cholesterol and bad cholesterol.
Before moving any further, it’s perhaps time to define what is meant by anarchy. The definition of anarchy from the Internet as a concept is commonly defined by what it excludes. Etymologically, anarchy is derived from the Greek: αναρχία, Romanized: anarchia; where “αν” (“an”) means “without” and “αρχία” (“archia”) means “ruler”. Therefore, anarchy is basically defined by the absence of rulers. In our case, good anarchy refers to the state of the OS, of active creativity, whereas bad anarchy is the state we’re presently living in, of orders and bosses. Needless to say, we’re living under the smokescreen of Enlightenment passing duocracy for democracy, coercion for freedom, and classes for wellbeing. It’s bestselling political fiction.
With no natural enemies of note north nor south after eliminating the natives and taking their lands, bringing blacks from Africa as slaves, a transplant people from Europe, two oceans shielding on both sides, with unlimited resources, it just grew and prospered.
Now finally, the semiquincentennial anniversary after for USA and the sesquicentennial for CBI, challenges within and without on the horizon for 2026. Passage from past to future isn’t automatic, no piggyback free-ride. The USA transplant same people new nation whereas Latin America testimony new people and new nation. The second 250th anniversary of USA and 150th anniversary of CBI with new peoples out of many peoples. Olde Americans from Europe and Neo Americans from non-Europe. Need to restart. Reinvent itsl
Enlightenment ideas was just application of the Renaissance of the civilizations of Greece and Rome cradle of the West, nothing new. Now that’s different, with remote originary civilization cradle of Mesoamerica.
Right leaning are 33%, left leaning are 33% and independents are 34%. The reasoning of independents is that if they stick together then can win. It’s a big if.
Polarization is driven by immigration. About Olde Americans versus Neo Americans. While there’s only one human race, there are many ethnicities. The focus should be on phenotype and not so much on genotype. Immigration now is like potluck, with each group bringing something unique to the table. It’s two-way both bringing and taking away.
Israel is unique or it is not. Consistency not contradiction is the norm. No double standards allowed in discourse. It can’t have it both ways, otherwise, everything goes and we’re back to square one of today’s morass in the Middle East, just like in the Whole West, and sinking deeper with every move that’s made. Israel was the victim till it learned power. Gaza, the Kristallnacht of October 7, 2023.
If affirmative, then it’s microcosm and requires global contexting. If negative, then Israel is just an ordinary nation state as Jewish Democracy, alongside other problematic national entities like Iran Islamic Republic and England Christian (Anglican) Nation. Israel as Jewish Democracy makes as much sense of America as Christian Democracy. The latter as unique is today’s questionable situation, the former as ordinary is trying something new instead of reiterating the same flawed one.
Let’s start with square one. There’s more than the question of the State of Palestine, for Israel doesn’t even have a constitution. One, Two, Triad State Solution for Israel? The solution isn’t in numbers one (1), or two (2) which can take care of themselves, but in redefining the concept of the state. First thing is first. First the cause followed by the second of effects as Cause/effects. Diaspora Jewry would have the right to vote on the Justice Power-R now constituted by the 5th power University-Dr and the 4th power News Media-Pr, and 3rd power Judicial-Rr. New protagonists of history would be brought in, of the Diaspora, of students and teachers, of reporters, of tutored infants. Zionism is like philosophy; it means whatever you want it to mean.
The New Guard as University students and infants under parental tutelage would take hold of the reins of things from the Old Guard, well informed by the self-sufficient News Media. There’s no need to wait forty years for them to die out, it can be done relay race style.
Peace in Israel is world peace, and world peace is peace in Israel. Therein lies its importance and urgency. Finding peace in Israel brings peace to the world, and conversely, finding peace in the world brings peace to Israel. This is precisely because Israel is the world’s microcosm, just as humanity is of the universe in QM and GR sizes. The difference between following and leading in Tikkun Olam is the approach taken of Israel as World’s Microcosm as the Cosmic option or as Jewish Democracy of the Orbital option.
Explaining PaRaDi/Se with the sandbox. (Now that we mention the fun sandbox, a personal anecdote. I vaguely recall and my mother once mentioned it the time that I went to Kindergarten. On the first day we arrived early and I was left at the sandbox. The problem was that I refused to go inside the classroom. My mom picked me up where she left me. Day two came and went and on day three I was taken out of the sandbox and from early schooling for good. End of story.)
Israel is the Holy Land, all else are profane lands. Can Israel then be a profane land? Can the argument subsist if one affirms the postulate of uniqueness and now assure that it’s ordinary? Unique and ordinary. Can you have it unique and ordinary, holy and profane, without adequate caveat? Unique just means one of a kind and ordinary just means there’s many of a kind. There isn’t much more to say than one is one, anymore that there is to a simple yes or no. But what can be said regarding many? Many isn’t any one, for then we would be talking about one not many.
In other words, solely one is one, many is not one. That leaves become as many become many. Well, this many becomes many presupposes a before, and after, and surely a during in between. Thus, this many is as one out of three distinct parts. This we call triad. Hence, we end up with an unbridgeable separation between them. Defining the transformation as identification of the pieces, we would have One-S / Triad-DRP, with Before-D During-R After-P. Though we used timewise to be and to become, but without loss of generality it extends any way we choose.
This is much like the sandbox inquiry of where the souls of pets go after passing. Well, maybe they cue up to come again for double dipping. The after to is just as good as the before from, referred to the during phase of life on earth. Same case here, the one the triad, start with one and end with triad. At one point we realize the gist of the game is that uni/triadism is the universal principle of knowledge. That all cases are just specific instances of the same generalest norm. Much like an illustrative example of a sample case demonstrating a generic scheme, or principle.
A last comment before moving on. Jewish nation is a mixed bag meaning a religion, a people, and a civilization. Something along the lines of Israelism as Originary Sign-S / Cosmovision-DRP, Religion-D Civilization-R People-P. This is unique and doesn’t extend to the NT, which is just a religion not a people or civilization, however much its claim to universality. In our jargon, it’s 2nd Derivative as Greece based in turn on the 1st Derivative Israel, with Mesopotamia and Egypt as background, plus Barbarian Europe. That is, solely Israelism has cosmovision as does Mesoamerica, no one else, with due regard to the initial restriction of leaving China, India and Andean aside for the moment in order to make the argument manageable. Someone who knows about China and India and Andean will probably find something to add or to corroborate to Mesoamerica as OSC. By the way, perhaps Hinduism alongside Judaism qualifies as well as triad religion, civilization, and people. But we’ll leave drop this originary matter for another occasion.
A simple solution out of the morass meeting the criterium could be Israel as Jewish & Non-Jewish Democracy, and likewise, Palestine as Muslim & Non-Muslim Democracy. Apartheid state is not acceptable. It would make more sense to just leave it as democratic state. But if one insists in Jewish, then the longer version would apply for both states side by side.
A win in Israel is a loss elsewhere. Actions have consequences. What does “from the river to the sea” mean? Depending on who says it, but it’s an invitation for the other to go for a swim. Things went from good Jew & bad Arab, to good Palestine and antisemitism. It’s not Dark mystery of Energy-&-Matter, it’s thanks to Mr. Bibi’s charm. A single look at rubble in Gaza and red roofs in the West bank will do.
The Fourth Transformation (4T) is the name of the ideology of the MoReNa Party (National Regeneration Movement) in power in Mexico 2018 onwards, with subheading “La esperanza de México” (The hope of Mexico). The alleged transformations were 1st T Independence, 2nd T Reform, 3rd T Revolution, and now 4th T Regeneration of post neoliberalism. Morena’s platform combines elements of left-wing populism, progressivism, and social democracy. It opposes neoliberal economic policies and supports expanded social welfare programs, increased public investment in infrastructure, and state control over strategic industries such as energy, oil, and electricity. The 4T is the sole worldwide progressive movement of the left, whereas the conservative right is in full bloom elsewhere.
Sublimely, the MoReNa cause, movement and eventually party alludes to the brownness of the originary population as well as to empower womanhood over machismo. Similarly, the PRI party to Primero (First), with the PAN party literally means Pan (Bread). Exceptions would be the left-wing splinter of PRD from the PRI party as well as more recently the MC Citizen’s Movement. The Green party to the global cause turned movement and then party, with the Labor party to the leftist tradition.
The PaRaDi/Se Principle approach integrates society. The Issues approach is fodder for political parties to prey on unsuspecting electorate from democracy unto duocracy. It’s best to combine strategy of system with tactics of issues. Let’s starve it preemptively. But while the ideology of the 4T is supposedly Mexican Humanism, it still lacks defining its character. Its numerous anti ultra-blue reforms may soon find itself in the infra-red region of the political spectrum. It would benefit greatly from the PaRaDi/Se Principle of uni/triadism as based both on Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli (Flower Song / Life) and on Alef / BeReshIth (A / InBeginningOf). If the 4T Regeneration of AMLO is Mexican Humanism, then the 4T2P (4th Transformation 2nd Floor, 2o Piso) of Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo would be Reconstitution by Mexoamerica’s Humanism.
PaRaDi/Sism would help the presidency’s 2nd Floor of the 4T to realize the ideals of the 4T, instead of solely being anti-neoliberalism pro-Neosocialism. Transcend PostModernity as the last leg of Enlightenment Period and inaugurate the Cosmovision Age of Peace. Politics on its own isn’t going to resolve the underlying moral issue of widespread and deeply rooted corruption stemming since the 3T and before. Violence is a sign of corruption of the Age of Enlightenment as per the Period of Modernity, or PostModernity.
Where to start to right the wrongs done to humanity? Where, if not from the bottom up with the Originary Americans, their admixed descendants, the Afro-descendants, and on up the deep well? But not only that, where also to start to benefit humanity if not from the residue of the OS of the originary civilization of Mesoamerica and First (1st) Derivative Israel?
I have a message to deliver, and there are many ways of doing it, much like all roads lead to Rome, but this time all roads lead from the OS. Just connect the dots from anywhere to the unique destiny. My latest book (2025) develops the ripple of peace and is dedicated to Claudia in the hope that she realizes the cosmovision of Mesoamerica and Israel.
Another advantage of the University as 5th power is that it would put innovation in research and development upfront at the wheel. Forget AI, it’s active creativity of human intelligence.
By the way, one thing that Israelis and Mesoamericans have in common is that they consider themselves originaries, before there were nation states.
Protesta y propuesta a Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo y a AMLO
El humanismo mexicano, pensamiento del partido MoReNa enunciado por Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO), viene a ser la piedra angular de la 4T (Cuarta transformación), y, por ende sostén de la 2P (Segundo piso) de Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo (CSP). La protesta es la advertencia de no acabar como la 3T de recorrer el espectro de revolución neosocial del PRI a refundación neoliberal del PAN. La propuesta es ir más allá de la mira nacional del humanismo mexicano a la cosmovisión del humanismo de la civilización originaria de Mesoamérica como receptora del residuo del signo originario aunado al teísmo de Israel como 1ª derivada de las civilizaciones originarias de Mesopotamia y Egipto.
Al buen entendedor pocas palabras. La propuesta viene a ser una teoría de todo. Para ello es preciso dejar atrás la postrimerías de la Edad de la Ilustración, e, inaugurar las primicias de la Edad de la Cosmovisión. Nuestra tesis versa sobre la anarquía y la civilización de la cosmovisión del signo originario del principio PaRaDi/So del humanismo de Mesoamérica y del teísmo de Israel. Pero vayamos por partes, y, con pies de plomo.
Después del humanismo diferenciado y trinitario de Grecia, y, por ende de Occidente, el siguiente sería el teísmo/ humanismo integral y triádico de Mesoamérica e Israel. Lo usual es desarrollar la teoría y sólo después pasar a presentar la práctica. Todo ello se encuentra en el sitio en internet www.paradisism.com, misma que se basa en mis obras que se encuentran en Amazon. Pero dada la naturaleza de una presentación en video para un público general, es preferible invertir el orden y empezar con la aplicación práctica al caso que nos ocupa de México, dejando para el último la teoría de la cosmovisión global del signo originario.
Aplicación modelo de estado“53i+”:
En esta Era de la información, dado que la información es un derecho humano, los Medios de comunicación deberían ser un poder autónomo del estado. En esta Era del conocimiento, dado que el conocimiento es un derecho humano, la Universidad en calidad de educación y cultura debería ser un poder autónomo del estado. Si la justicia se persigue en su doble dimensión, como Justicia/justicia, entonces los poderes de la Universidad y de los Medios de comunicación deberían respaldar el Poder Judicial. Si el individuo tiene una naturaleza triádica compuesta por lo espiritual, lo mental y lo físico, entonces debería haber tres (3) votos por persona. Si el voto es un derecho humano universal, entonces los infantes deberían tener derecho a voto tutelado. Si las mujeres aún no son iguales a los hombres, entonces necesitan empoderamiento. Dado que los niños son una extensión biológica de sus madres, el derecho a voto de los infantes es Sufragio femenil 2.0.
A continuación, nos adelantamos y emplearemos el principio universal del conocimiento de la sección de la teoría a manera de fórmula para codificar los conceptos. El asunto es que las instituciones deben sujetarse a la norma de PaRaDi/So. Actualmente, la reliquia de la Ilustración que tenemos es la Constitución-S / Estado “31a-”-DRP, compuesto por tres (3) poderes, un (1) voto por persona, sufragio para adultos (a), y menos (-) todo lo demás que debilita la democracia hasta convertirla en una duocracia. Pero aplicando la mencionada norma, esto nos daría la constitución de estado “53i+”. Esta consiste en Constitución-S / Estado “53i+”-DRP, con cinco (5) poderes, tres (3) votos por persona, con sufragio infantil (i), además de (+) todo lo demás que fortalecen la democracia.
A continuación emplearemos la fórmula general siguiente: Constitución-S / Estado-DRP, Legislativo-D Judicial-R Ejecutivo-P, con subtríada Universidad-Dr Judicial-Rr Medios-Pr. Ahora bien, el concepto de los cinco (5) poderes proviene de la subtríada del Poder Judicial-R, que se desglosa en la subtríada Universidad-Dr, Poder Judicial-Rr, y, Medios-Pr. El concepto de tres (3) votos por persona se deriva del hecho de que el Individuo-S / Elector-DRP, se compone de Creencias-D Valores-R Intereses-P. La “i” representa el sufragio infantil tutelado por sus padres. El signo “más (+)” simboliza el fortalecimiento de la democracia al asignar la administración del presupuesto a la Universidad (5º poder), y, las elecciones a los Medios (4º poder). Por supuesto, los demás poderes del estado son los usuales Legislativo (1º poder), Ejecutivo (2º poder), y, Judicial (3º poder).
Teoría de la cosmovisión:
El asunto es que, según Heidegger, nadie se puede brincar su propia sombra. No hay manera de darle la vuelta al asunto de fondo de que nos encontramos en un atascadero de la historia. Que para salir del atolladero precisa hacerse la pregunta acerca de cuál es el principio universal del conocimiento. A saber, el principio racional universal del conocimiento es el principio temporal universal del conocimiento. Siendo este el caso, para abordar el principio racional en el principio temporal habría que remontarnos a las seis (6) civilizaciones originarias. Por un lado, del este en África y Asia de Egipto y Mesopotamia, y del oeste en Asia en India y China, y, por el otro lado, las del mediodía en las Américas, del sur la Andina, y del norte en Mesoamérica. Ahora bien, simplificando las cosas con miras a hacerlo más manejable, vamos a reducir el campo, por un lado, a Egipto y Mesopotamia, y, por el otro, a Mesoamérica, haciendo a un lado pero sin perder generalidad las de India, China, y, Andina.
Más aún, en vez de tratar directamente con Egipto y Mesopotamia, de las cuales sabemos demasiado en concreto y a la vez insuficiente en abstracto, vamos a considerar la 1ª Derivada de Israel a partir de estas dos. El asunto es dar con la fórmula que capte la esencia de esa cultura.
Las siglas de la cábala primeval de PaRaDi/So corresponden a Sod Secreto (סוֹד)-S / Derash Descubrir (דְּרַשׁ)-DRemez Remitir (רֶמֶז)-RPeshat Plano (פְּשָׁט)-P. PaRaDi/So consiste en “El Un entero-S es-/-deviene Partes de tríada-DRP”.
Para el caso de Israel contamos con la cábala primeval en Génesis 1:1a/Alef como Alef/ BeReshIth A/ EnPrincipioDe (א/בְּ-רֵאשִׁ֖-ית). Lo anterior debido a que ello consiste en la primera letra del alfabeto hebreo aunado a la primera palabra de la Torá Enseñanza (תוֹרָה). La letra Alef A (א) significa uno (1), y, como alto glotal significa al Creador. Similarmente, la primera palabra consiste en la tríada BeReshIth EnPrincipioDe (בְּ-רֵאשִׁ֖-ית) y significa la Creación. De ser ello el caso, de Alef/BeReshIth A/EnPrincipioDe obtendríamos A-S mando-/-obediencia En-D Principio-R De-P. También como Creador-S creativo-/-criatura Creación-DRP, Adorar-D Obedecer-R Trabajar-P. Dentro de la cábala primeval las siglas de Israel serían S/DRP.
Para el caso de Mesoamérica, la fórmula esencial viene a ser Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli (Flor Canto / Vida) o bien Ixtli Áyotl / Yoliztli (Cara Corazón / Vida). De ser ello el caso, obtendríamos Xóchitl–P (_)-RCuícatl–D artesanía-/-creatividad Yoliztli–S. Las siglas de Mesoamérica serían PRD/S.
The future lies in the new generations. Quite a platitude, yet in our day and times this translates as Gen Z, those born between 1997-2012, adolescence and youth, succeeding the Millennials and preceding the Generation Alfa. This would make them as of 2025 around the ages 13-28. The point is that this generation is one primordially composed of students in Middle School through College, including graduate school. Their contact with civilization besides their parents and peers is with teachers and professors. In a nutshell, the University as the social institution as civilization, same which we’ve identified throughout this essay as the 5th Power of the State, hence the “5” in the “53i+” State.
This generation witnessed the passing from analogue to digital information. The Age of information is crucial to understanding this generation, hence the “5” of the Media as the 4th Power of the “53i+” State. The lower part of Gen Z and the higher one of Gen Alfa would have three (3) votes per person, as in the “3” in the “53i+” State, but most importantly having to do with the “i” of Infant Suffrage tutored by parents. Yes, just like this generation is somehow tutored in school by academics, likewise, they’re tutored at home but lacking suffrage rights as citizens.
Now that we’ve properly identified in whose hands is the future, we can proceed with the ongoing Gen Z political marches across the globe from Nepal to Mexico and beyond. As protests go, the identifying banner is the One Piece of Jolly Rogers having a grinning skull with a pirate’s straw hat fighting a corrupt World Government. They’re fighting against authoritarianism, corruption, injustice, and whatever else is wrong with our state and society. Their slogan in this case is “For a just, free and secure Mexico”. It is PaRaDi/Se compliant as Mexico-S One Piece-/-Jolly Roger Just-D Free-D Secure-P.
Being a Baby Boomer, I must confess ignorance on Gen Z digital meme culture. That said, let’s try to understand where these two generations cross or embrace, so to speak. At least briefly as far as the OSC is concerned. Let’s narrow it down to “One piece”. This reminds me of one way of phrasing OSC as “The One whole is, and becomes triad pieces”, substituting piece for parts. Or else more to the point as Uni/triad or One/triad piecesof the PaRaDi/Se Principle. One Piece is just Uni/Triad.
Not following the trend, I don’t get the meaning behind Jolly Rogers nor the grinning skull. However, what does stand out are what the pirate is fighting for. Some sort of good anarchy, of a return to originary civilization of mythical times. The point in all this is the refusal of the Gen Z to settle for less than what makes things right. That is, refusing the Social-justice wishy-washy feeling-good paradigm, and in their own manner calling out for something more akin to going all the way with Justice/justice pursue, as illustrated throughout these pages. For something to be identified with the Gen Z, it has to be owned by them. Anarchy is their quest.
So that no one misses it. To lead with the OSC and refusing to cue and follow by falling in line behind the Old Guard of those who’ve given up on their dreams and fatally accepted an unjust world as a matter of fact. Note that there’s no easy answer of waiting for the Messiah, but rather manifesting their way out of the morass in their own age related figurative digital manner.
In following is presented a schematic diagram of the logical structure of the cosmovision of the Originary Sign (OS) hypothesis and its applications, or of OSC. It starts with the convened state of good anarchy after the stage of hunters gatherers coming out of savagery and before the advent of the originary civilizations. It surely goes further back but there’s no way of telling either way.
The postulate of cosmovision serves as foundation for the sake of argument and reasoning.
Causality is assumed in that the Originary Civilizations are cause and Derivative Civilizations are effect.
The Originary Sign (OS) is the characteristic of good anarchy provided to humanity and serves to distinguish it from animals. The OS serves as timeless reference with solely the residue of the OS observed.
There are six (6) originary civilizations dating from six to ten (10-6K) thousand years ago. These are Mesopotamia, Egypt, India, China, Mesoamerica, and Andean. The two (2) in the Americas are independent from the three (3) of Asia and one (1) of Africa.
As axiom. The residue of the OS is detected in the Nahuatl language of the Toltecáyotl of Mesoamerica in the difrasism Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli (Flower Song / Life), or else in Ixtli Áyotl / Yoliztli (Face Heart / Life). There is no recognizable residue of the OS in the other originary civilizations. Without loss of generality, in a first approximation we’ll leave aside India and China, as well as the Andean civilization.
As axiom. There is the 1st (first) Derivative of Israel out of Mesopotamia and Egypt. It is the primeval kabbalah consisting of the first letter of Hebrew Alef A (א) and the first word of Genesis BeReshIth InBeginningOf (בְּ-רֵאשִׁ֖-ית), to make Alef/BeReshIth A/InBeginningOf (א/בְּ-רֵאשִׁ֖-ית).
As convention. In formulaic presentation Moses’ New School primeval kabbalah is PaRaDi/Se. This is not to be confused with Moisés de León’s Old School medieval kabbalah ofPaRDeS. Medieval kabbalah of PaRDeS is primeval kabbalah seen through Western eyes. Recall in all this, that Israel is 1st Derivative, Greece is 2nd Derivative, and the West is 3rd Derivative, composed very much like dovetail. Perhaps the concept of function and functional may come in handy to explain these derivations from the residue of the OSC.
As for the timeline. Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli Flower Song / Life as ayotl lay alive on the surface in oral tradition of Mesoamerica, whereas Alef/BeReshIth A/InBeginningOf as kabbalah lay buried at the foundations of the written tradition of the Torah of Israel. This last one with time surfaced as Medieval kabbalah during the Middle Ages, dark ages characterized by barbarian paganism and late Egyptian and Mesopotamian esotericism influences. Whereas the former permanently stayed on the surface in its sayings, songs and the like. The thing is that medieval kabbalah is based on the whole TaNaKh, whereas primeval kabbalah of the PaRaDi/Se principle precedes the Torah. The stories in the Torah are ultimately illustrative exemplifications of the OSC. In abstract formula, OS-S Cosmo-/-vision OS Residue-DRP, Religion-D Philosophy-R Science-P.
In written tradition, what comes first as foundations ends at the bottom out of view, whereas in oral tradition, what comes first as foundations stays on top in view. In oral tradition, the first is always first, on top, whereas in written tradition, the first ends last, under all else. Primeval kabbalah is holistic whereas medieval kabbalah is analytical. Cosmovision survived in the open in Mesoamerica whereas it went underground in the remaining originary civilizations. Primeval kabbalah as the PaRaDi/Se principle is cosmovision first and foremost.
As theorem. With the benefit of hindsight by standing on the shoulders of Moses’ PaRaDi/Se, and then seeing things through his eyes, one can understand Mesoamerica’s residue of the OS and Israel’s 1st Derivative. Only then does the evidence become apparent that in the difrasism Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli (Flower Song / Life) we have Xóchitl-P Cuícatl-D / Yoliztli-S, or else Ixtli-P Áyotl-D / Yoliztli-S(Face Heart / Life).The sequence is P_D, R, /, S, to become PRD/S.
As equation. Moses as author of the Pentateuch understood it deductively as S/DRP, Elohim-S covert-/-overt Humanity-DRP, Spiritual-D Mental-R Physical-P. The inductive Nahuatl Toltecáyotl PRD/S contrasts as its mirror image to the deductive Hebrew kabbalah S/DRP.
As assumption. Solely the cosmic option can serve Tikkun Olam. The microcosm is reflected in the macrocosm. Israel is the microcosm of the world.
As notion. The world is hurting. Harnessing the laws of nature has brought progress, how much more so if knowing the law of culture.
As corollary. The six-hundred thirteen (613) commandments of the prayer obedience tradition reduce to the One (1) Commandment. Doing the gematria math 613=>6+1+3=10=>1+0=1!
As corollary. The One (1) commandment is to be actively creative, as YHVH is Creator. It debunks the traditional one of “obey and pray” and inaugurates “be actively creative”.
As corollary. Theism as S/DRPand humanism as PRD/S. Or else as Theism/Humanism of S/DRP, or as Humanism/Theism PRD/S. But S/DRP is teaching and PRD/S is learning.
As corollary. Mexoamerica’s humanism and Israel’s theism. The status of Israel is twice removed from the residue of OS of Mesoamerica.
As corollary. From Mono-dualism unto Uni/triadism.
As standard model. The acid test of making sense is the PaRaDi/Se standard. That is, everything that is the case is PaRaDi/Se compliant.
As corollary. From Age of Enlightenment to the Cosmovision Age of Peace.
As application. At present we have the “31a-” Enlightenment Constitution composed of a 3-power state, 1 vote per person, adult suffrage, and minus (-) all others which diminishes democracy unto duocracy. Making the state PaRaDi/Se compliant, would give us the “53i+” Constitution. This is composed of a 5-power state and 3 votes per person, of infant suffrage, plus (+) all other considerations which enhance democracy. Social justice tries to obtain concessions by a gloved hand from an otherwise unfair state. Just society derives naturally from a just state.
Originary Civilization Cosmovision of Mesoamerica & 1st Derivative Israel
Infant Suffrage is Women’s Suffrage 2.0! The “53i+” State for Peace in the World & Middle East!
Six (6) Originary Civilizations: Mesopotamia, Egypt, China, India, Mesoamerica, Andean. In order to make things manageable the model is simplified without loss of generality by pausing China, India, and Andean, and solely focusing on Egypt and Mesopotamia by way of its synthesis First Derivative Israel, and in Mesoamerica as sole originary civilization of interest. Recall that lack of proof is not proof of absence. Israel-Greece is 1.5K bce, Mesoamerica is 2.5K bce. Andean is 3.5K bce. Egypt is 3K bce. Mesopotamia is 4K bce. China is 3K bce. India is 5K bce. Dates are rough estimates. Egypt & Mesopotamia, China & India connected. Disconnected from Mesoamerica & Andean.
Nomenclature of Primeval Kabbalah, its model underpinnings. PRD/SPaRaDi/Se: With slash-/ as in S covert-/-overt DRP. Sod Secret (סוֹד)-S / Derash Discover (דְּרַשׁ)-DRemez Remit (רֶמֶז)-RPeshat Plain (פְּשָׁט)-P The Creator-S of creative-/-creature of Creation-DRP, with Time-D Space-R Mass-P
New School of Thought: PaRaDi/Se. Butterfly Ripple Cosmovision Age of Peace Comprehensive theory based on Principle
Old School of Thought: PaRDe(S) Evolution & Stationary Laundry list of priorities based on Issues
Postulate of Originary Sign Cosmovision (OSC). To avoid an infinite regression, postulate the Originary Sign Cosmovision as the Butterfly Ripple Cosmovision Age of Peace. The sequence of states would be then unto hunter-gatherers, good anarchy, & originary civilization.
OSC is uni/triadism as Unitheism/ triadhumanism, as PaRaDi/Sism, as Alef/BeReshIth, as Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli and as“The one whole is, & becomes triad parts”. OS-S / Cosmovision-DRP, Religion-D Philosophy-R Science-P.
Alef/BeReshIth (A/InBeginningOf) Egypt & Mesopotamia none survived 1st Derivative of Egypt & Mesopotamia Israel Kabbalah (1.5K bce)
Xóchitl-P (_)-R Cuícatl-D/ Yoliztli-S. Triad\Uni PRD/S. Inductive by active discovery. One command in Genesis 1:1a/Alef. 613=>6+1+3=10=1+0=1! Active creativity
Alef–S/Be–DResh–RIth–P. Uni/Triad S/DRP. Deductive by God’s revelation. The 613 commandments in all TaNaKh. Pray & Obey!
Mesoamerica authenticates Israel’s claim, and Israel identifies Mesoamerica’s. Postulate of Originary Sign (OS) at T*=0. Mesoamerica’s áyotl is residue of the OS.
Mesoamerica authenticates Israel’s claim, though Israel helps identify Mesoamerica’s. Postulate of Originary Sign (OS) at T*=0. Israel is residue twice removed of the OS.
Cosmovision: Genesis 1:1a/Alef Alef/InBeginningOf! Alef InBeginningOf created. InBeginningOf created Powers. Created Powers dialogue-with … and dw… Powers is dw the heavens & dw the earth:
Conventional: Genesis 1:1-3 In the beginning Elohim created… Or else, Rashi: In the beginning of Elohim’s creating … when the earth… And said Elohim “Let there be light”, and there was light:
Cradle of West as Religion of Israel & all else from Greece.
Uni/triadism. PaRaDi/Se. S/DRP (פרד/ס). Torah is Unitheism/triadhumanism.
Mono-dualism. PaRDe(S). D(s)RP (פרדס). Torah is Monotheism/duohumanism
Greece 2nd Derivative of 1st Derivative Israel of Originary Egypt-Mesopotamia. Ion of Chios (Ἴων ὁ Χῖος) (490-420bce, Ionia) in Triagmos (Τριαγμός). Pythagorean. “The beginning of my work is: everything is Three and nothing more or less than these three. The virtue of each thing is a Triad: intelligence, strength, luck.” (DK36B1) This comes across as Virtue-S / Triad-DRP, Luck-D Intelligence-R Strength-P. Philolaus of Croton (Φιλόλαος) published On Nature. Pythagorean. Nature (physis) in the world-order (cosmos) was fitted together out of things which are unlimited & which are limiting, both the world-order as a whole & everything in it. (DK44B1) Cosmos Whole-S / Nature everything-DRP, Unlimited-D Fitted together-R Limiting-P. Pythagoras Secret Sect-S / Parmenides Eleatic-D Pythagorean-R Thales Milesian-P
Approaches: Principle & Issues
Creativity with joyful happiness.
Pray & obey with joyless happiness.
One command. 613=>6+1+3=10=1+0=1! Be creatively active! Be actively creative!
The 613 and 10 commandments. Pray & Obey!
If you can’t beat them, lead them
If you can’t beat them, join them
Integrate yes, assimilate no.
Integrate no, assimilate no.
Focused clarity. Deduced from OS Principle
Diffused confusion. Placed on Issues by glove & hand.
Shalom Olam World Peace & Middle East
Tikkun Olam World Repairing, cease wars
Justice/justice pursue: Just-State for Just-Society
Transactional dealings Social Justice of Unsound State
Peace XXII century III Millennium
Enlightenment XIX century II Millennium
No quemes tu pólvora en infiernillos.
Burning one’s gunpowder on fireworks
Principle. Lead by integrating.
Issues. Follow by abstaining.
‘53i+’ State for Israel-Palestine
‘31a-’ Israel Jewish State, no Palestine
5-power State Legislative-1st Executive-2nd Judicial-3rd Media (information, elections) 4th power University (knowledge, budget) 5th power
3-power State Legislative-1st Executive-2nd Judicial-3rd
3 votes/person 4 good anarchy democracy End two-party Reps-&-Dems rule
1 v/person is 2-party bad anarchy duocracy Reds-&-Blues taking turns at the spoils
Infant Suffrage tutored by mom & dad is Women’s Suffrage 2.0!
Adult suffrage only. Men & women, kids wait till 18Y.
Uni/triadism. PaRaDi/Se. S/DRP (פרד/ס). Torah is Unitheism/triadhumanism
Mono-dualism. PaRDe(S). D(s)RP (פרדס). Read as D function of s, D(s).
The claim made is that everything that is the case falls under the umbrella of the OSC. What this means is that pretty much everything is PaRaDi/Se complaint. So far, we’ve laid out the theory and focused on its application to political philosophy by way of comparing the 53i+ Peace State of “Justice/justice pursue: Just-State for Just-Society”, over the 31a- Enlightenment State of “Social justice pursue: Unjust State for Unjust Society”. But recall that holism is understood as uni/triadism with OS-S / Cosmovision-DRP, Religion-D Philosophy-R Science-P.
In this brief essay of cosmovision mention is made in the above figures as it applies to biology with the protist cell and as applies to foundations of mathematics in linking logic and set theory. But in the works the attempts are greatly extended to include AA, Buddhism, and other important cases of interest too numerous to mention.
The point pursued in these is to demonstrate the universal validity of the OSC by way of PaRaDi/Se compliance. The mappings match as hand to glove. The geometrical representation consist of a circle as the one single whole containing a main right triangle as a triad, which in turn unfold as right triangles as subtriads. The ultimate proof of the OSC would be to provide a standard model which accounts for all dark-&-light stuff in the universe. At present the QM and GR models account for under 5% of the universe, mainly the light stuff leaving us in the dark regarding the remaining 95% as 30% dark matter and 75% dark energy, roughly speaking.
Now, when referring to the new era of the Cosmovision Age of Peace, things aren’t going to suddenly change as by magic wand, but then we will once we’re aware that mono-dualism is trash and take up uni/triadism as in OSC. This is much like the case of Nachshon (נַחְשׁוֹן) who was the first to set foot on the Red Sea and made it open wide. The etymology of the word is nachash snake (נחש), or nachóshet copper or bronze (נחשת), or items made from bronze. Adjective means nachush bronze (נחוש), and noun means nechusha copper or bronze (נחושה). That is, that Elohim empowered Moses who in turn ordered the Beney Yisrael Children of Israel (בְּנֵ֣י יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל) to cross the sea. But nothing happened without fusing revealed creative activity with discovered active creativity.
There’s a valid analogy between the Standard Model of Particle Physics and the Originary Sign Cosmovision of the PaRaDi/Se Principle. It states that a handful of particles and fields comprise the basics, and from there on upwards are built as a skyscraper: from particles, to atoms, to molecules, to organelles, to cells, to tissues, to organs, to systems, to organisms, both individual and social and so on. Same occurs with the standard model of humanity: the Originary Sign Cosmovision, to the PaRaDi/Se Principle, to its numerous applications, and so on. It’s necessary to state because we mostly have contact with the applications in our daily lives, other than with the theory when in deep reflection.
Please opine. The storyline is about the strategic plan arising from an envisioning retreat of the Board of Congregation Beth Israel (CBI). The consultant Fayruz marks the tone by highlighting the bottom line as a mixture of audacious dreaming, clear transformation themes, and infectious enthusiasm. The president of the Board Corrie articulates the ends in her message for the future. She highlights the audacious dream of creating a Jewish renaissance as consisting of a spiritual ecosystem that radiates outward consisting of environmental and social justice leadership, multigenerational learning and growth. That what makes this vision possible is that CBI has learned to navigate change while staying true, all the while creating a space that feels magical by making Judaism relevant again. The reference is to the Halloween 2021 arson attempt at CBI. That it’s exciting because this vision is already beginning and the work ahead is inspiring. Moreover, that the city of Austin is ready for these changes, that kehillah means more than membership to a synagogue. That the voice and vision of each member matters, that in the present the future starts in the past. Lastly, given that Fayruz’ tone and Corrie’s ends are a tall order by any measure, member Ric provides a corresponding cosmovision as the means to achieve success of the trailblazing strategic plan.
If in your opinion, the sketch of a strategic plan makes no sense, then trash it and continue living in our present state of bad anarchy of postmodernity, ravism, prayer and obedience. But if the argument makes all the sense in the world, then let’s turn the page and inaugurate the Cosmovision Age of Peace of good anarchy and start the Cause/movement of the Originary Sign (OS). The endorsed approach is not dualism’s critical analysis of the political problem with no clue of solution, other than placing things by gloved hand out of the head and beating heart, but rather derives from principle linked to the OS. Recall that democracy comes from 2nd Derivative Greece later naturalized by 3rd Derivative West into the wildcard that we have today. So then, what is this good anarchy of the OS? But before we get to the applications, let’s display the cosmovision upfront.
The schematics of the OS layout is as follows. The Originary Sign (OS) hypothesis is that there’s a point/origin marking the advent of humanity from whatever was previously the case. Good anarchy as still wholly guided by the OS would then be posited between the stage of hunter-gathering and originary civilization proper when the triad sharded into three separate pieces as of this morning. There were six (6) originary civilizations, but for convenience without loss of generality we’ll put on hold China, India, and Andean and consider solely Mesopotamia, Egypt together, and Mesoamerica quite apart.
There’s the 1st (first) Derivative of Israel out of Mesopotamia and Egypt. It is the primeval kabbalah consisting of the first letter of Hebrew Alef A (א) and the first word of Genesis BeReshIth InBeginningOf (בְּ-רֵאשִׁ֖-ית), to make Alef/BeReshIth A/InBeginningOf (א/בְּ-רֵאשִׁ֖-ית). In formulaic presentation Moses’ New School primeval kabbalah is PaRaDi/Se. This is not to be confused with Moisés de León’s Old School medieval kabbalah ofPaRDeS. Essentially, it’s Alef–S / Be–DResh–RIth–P(A-S / In-D Beginning-R Of-P), with the slash-/ as S holy-/-profane DRP, as S/DRP. Neatly, the OS as the Universal Principle of Knowledge is “theone whole is and becomes triad parts”, or else in acronym formula as PaRaDi/Se.
It’s mentioned first though Israel came after Mesoamerica because solely thanks to it can one identify the cue of the residue of the OS. The residue of the OS is detected in the Toltecáyotl of Nahuatl Mesoamerica in the difrasism Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli (Flower Song / Life), or else in Ixtli Áyotl / Yoliztli (Face Heart / Life). Only then does the evidence become apparent that in the difrasism Xóchitl Cuícatl (Flower Song) we have Xóchitl-P Cuícatl-D / Yoliztli-Sor else Ixtli-P Áyotl-D / Yoliztli-S(Face Heart / Life).The sequence is P_D, R, /, S, to become PRD/S. On the other hand, Moses understood it deductively as S/DRP, Elohim-S covert-/-overt Humanity-DRP, Spiritual-D Mental-R Physical-P. This inductive Nahuatl Toltecáyotl PRD/S contrasts as its mirror image to the deductive Hebrew kabbalah S/DRP.
Now to the applications. The six-hundred thirteen (613) commandments of the submissive tradition can be reduced to the One (1) Commandment. Doing the gematria math 613 => 6+1+3 = 10 => 1+0 = 1! The One (1) commandment is to be actively creative, as YHVH is Creator. It debunks the convoluted one of “obey and pray” and inaugurates simply “be actively creative”.
Now the comparative. Theism as S/DRP and humanism as PRD/S. Or else Theism/Humanism of S/DRP, or as Humanism/Theism PRD/S. But S/DRP is teaching and PRD/S is learning. Mexoamerica’s humanism and Israel’s theism. The status of Israel is once removed from the residue of OS of Mesoamerica.
Now the takeaways. From Age of Enlightenment to Cosmovision Age of Peace. As standard model from Mono-dualism unto Uni/triadism. The acid test of making sense is the PaRaDi/Se standard. That is, everything that is the case is PaRaDi/Se compliant.
Justice, politics, and the state. At present we have the “31a-” Enlightenment Constitution composed of a 3-power state, 1 vote per person, adult suffrage, and minus (-) all others which diminishes democracy unto duocracy. Making the state PaRaDi/Se compliant, would give us the “53i+” Constitution. This is composed of a 5-power state and 3 votes per person, of infant suffrage, the “plus (+)” comes from enhancing democracy by placing the running of the budget under the University 5th power and elections under the Media 4th power. Social justice tries to obtain concessions by a gloved hand from an otherwise unfair state. Just society derives naturally from a just state.
In other words, the two (2) originary civilizations of Mesopotamia-&-Egypt fused and were lost but were rescued as if frozen in time via Israel as their First (1st) Derivative. Fortunately, we have testimonies and records of the originary civilization of Mesoamerica which survived till recently of its conquest in 1512. That is, Mesoamerica is the sole surviving originary civilization and Israel is the sole First (1st) Derivative of the lost originary civilizations of Mesopotamia-&-Egypt.
Which is better dead lion or alley cat? Which is best, head of a mouse or tail of a lion? Start a cause/movement or become just another local chapter of yet another national organization financed by the 100-99%? After all is said and done, you either know better or else you choose not to know. Acting creatively isn’t about figuring distinctions but about making a difference. Now that we know about the primeval humanist cradle of the world in Mesoamerica as anarchy and civilization, over and above the Eurocentric cradle of the West as capitalism and socialism, we get to decide what to do. That is, capitalism or socialism is a false dichotomy. In the usual abstract terms, the choice is between uni/triadism and mono-dualism and at the application level between the “53i+” Peace (Joy) State and the “31a-” War (Sad) State. And still more specifically regarding the USA, Republicans or Democrats is a false dichotomy, the choice is between the Cradle of the World and the previous reference one of the Cradle of the West.
The choice isn’t the easy way out of leaving it to the coming of the Messiah, but rather a combination of praying and obeying and of acting creatively. But beware, that lacking proof is not proof of absence. Things may still come to be for all we know, irrespective of what we might think and do. In any case, it may actually be what is needed for it to come to be.
How does one distinguish one’s self from the crowd by being another local chapter of a national issues platform? To lead or to follow, that is the question. Doing what’s right or feeling good, that is the quest. The menu of choices is a whole spectrum ranging from social capitalism or republican capitalism, conservative, moderate, progressive, democratic socialism, or else OSC! The OS projects its cosmovision to city, state, national and beyond levels, whereas the Social Justice Issues being status quo is a non-starter dead on arrival. Years in action but it hasn’t made a difference. Poor are getting poorer and going homeless, rich getting richer, and so on. The idea of watering plants from above like rain is fine for nature, but we water plants to the roots for optimal results. The idea of forcing water to trickle down of Social Justice is unfounded hope. It does more damage than good by misplacing hope on rocks rolling uphill.
The term capitalism comes from the Latin word caput, meaning “head”. From there in Hebrew head resh (רֵאשִׁ֖) comes across as beginning as mental or mind, as in Human being-S covert-/-overt Human becoming-DRP, Spirit-D Mind-R Body-P. This takes us to breakdown the meaning of capitalism, and by extension of socialism, as flipsides of the cent (¢) of mentalism. Thus, the mind is the head and the head is the beginning, all as mentalism.
That is, instead of revelation’s S/DRP of Israel or discovery’s PRD/S of Mesoamerica, herein the West as Third Derivative of the residue of OSC highlights the midterm-R as the Mentalism-R functional. Surely in abstract space it will come across with greater clarity. The residue of the OSC spells out as Uni/triad and let’s take Uni-S/Triad-DRP by way of example. The problem surges with mono-dualism. Let’s express it as Mono-S - Dualism-DRP so as to illustrate the point.
Here what monism does is that to reshuffle the categories such that one ends having Covert-S impermeable-/ separated from the remaining manifestation of Overt-DRP, and not semi-permeable slash as in One whole S semipermeable-/ Triad parts-DRP. This means that, once monism puts the Secret-S out of reach, all we then have to deal with are the Three parts-DRP. The way then to connect these three is by way of the Reflection-R as hinge between Discover-D and Plain-P. However, the R now understood as Reflect as in a ball reflecting from a surface more so than meditation, hence the apt role of hinge. Likewise, Discover-D comes across now more as in Columbus discovered America when there were already people living there since originary times. Along the same lines would now be understood Plain-P, as the base board or wall of the bouncing Hai Alai ball.
This hinge of Mentalism-R now becomes a function of Spiritualism-D & of Physicalism-P, as in R(D) and R(P). Or maybe the other way around, of D(R) and P(R). But now the meanings change altogether, from Spiritual-D and Physical-P, now as functionals of Mentalism-R unto Capitalism-D(R) and Socialism-P(R). Of course, in practice it’s common to hedge bets by crossing terms and thus ensuring entitlement of justice, as in the double-standards of republican capitalism or social capitalism and democratic socialism. This serves to soften the fall or to stich the safety net. This is like the shell game where the house always wins over the unsuspecting player.
In the terminology of this approach, these two equally come to represent the violet and the blue of the spectrum of the “31a” Enlightenment Age State over the “53i+” Peace Age State. In our previous discussion the former translates as the Social-Justice approach of Issues and the latter the Justice/justice approach of the OSC principle. This helps align the ducks behind one main idea and not scattered about as in a laundry or shopping list.
But what do these two states come to represent in practice? The pride of Social Justice are the concessions gained from the “31a-” Sad State. Instead of having the people cushioned from a hard crash on the floor they’re now on their knees. With Justice/justice there would be no fall and the people would be standing tall on their own feet.
In following is the proposal form to apply to present a talk to a congregation.
For the sake of heaven, do assist the advent of the new era of The Cosmovision Age of Peace!
The Cosmovision Age of Peace! (On the Originary Sign of anarchy and civilization as PaRaDi/Se cosmovision). It’s about celebrating a discussion for the sake of heaven. Upfront let it me state that I love and respect my clergy and secular leadership and that there’s nothing personal in taking positions in argumentation. To that effect the invitation is made to the Jewish kehillah and general community to participate.
The difficulty is the lingering of crises in spite of the revelation of the Torah teaching civil behavior to humanity. Maybe we were expected to discover the other half to make the orange whole. The cause must lie in the fact that the cradle of the West isn’t the cradle of the World by a few thousand years. Essentially, the cradle of the West is Greece as State and Israel as Church. The remaining quest is investigating the cradle of the World in the six originary civilizations, namely, on the one hand, Mesopotamia and Egypt, inbetween China, India, and on the other hand, Mesoamerica and Andean. For the sake of manageability but without loss of generality, we’ll place China, India, and Andean on pause, and focus exclusively on the originary civilizations of Mesopotamia, Egypt, and Mesoamerica.
The postulate is the Originary Sign (OS) of which there’s no temporal access, but there’s the residue of this OS in the originary civilizations. Somehow this OS was lost in Mesopotamia and Egypt but somehow survived by fusion in Israel as First Derivative. This would then make Greece the Second Derivative of these two originaries and First D as well as of Barbarian Europe, with the West accordingly as Third Derivative, and so on. In order to avoid getting lost in literal analysis of texts, we’ve opted instead in favor of relying on logical synthesis of abstract space as will be clear in practice, as if assumed, though not expressly defined.
The following question is what the residue of the OS in Mesoamerica is. But in order to identify it we need to rely on the twice removed residue in Israel which we properly identify as Alef/BeReshIth A/InBeginningOf (א/בְּ-רֵאשִׁ֖-ית), as in Genesis 1:1a/Alef. It happens that for Mesoamerica the OS residue is Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli (Flower Song / Life), or else Ixtli Áyotl / Yoliztli (Face Heart / Life).
Thus, the mainframe in abstract space. From primeval kabbalah, it’s Alef–S / Be–DResh–RIth–P(A-S / In-D Beginning-R Of-P), with the slash-/ as S holy-/-profane DRP, as S/DRP. Now we’re in a position to make sense of toltecáyotl, it’s Xóchitl-P (_)-R Cuícatl-D / Yoliztli-S, where we would insert Life-S or Giver of Life-S, as PRD/S. Overall, kabbalah’s S/DRP is revelation, deductive, pray and obey, whereas áyotl’s PRD/S is discovery, inductive, and creative activity.
So much for the theory of the Originary Sign Cosmovision (OSC) which will become clear in the text. Now unto practice in an application on justice. Our position is the New School of thought of “Justice/justice pursue: Just-State for a Just-Society” as an alternative to “Social-Justice pursue: Unjust-State for an Unjust-Society”. The thing is that Social Justice is 2nd Derivative Greece. That is, Social-Justice is the NT’s interpretation of 1st Derivative OT’s Justice/justice as in Deut 16:20. This is clearly manifest in “give to Cesar what is Cesar’s and to Gd what is Gd’s” as in the synoptic gospels.
Previous OT as Old T fell in line with NT. Not so OT as Originary T, it leads! OT isn’t in theory what NT is in practice. They’re entirely different concepts as explained above. The problem with the Social Justice approach is that it doesn’t work. There are more poor people now than when this approach started decades ago. The cause being NT’s misinterpretation of OT’s Justice/justice as Social justice.
The presentation and the essay are based on my latest book (2025) at Amazon plus the vision of the CBI Board which appears as launching pad. It is proposed by the author as a joint project for ample discussion, though it is still subject to acceptance by the congregation.
All proportions kept, but this has the makings of a discussion for the sake of heaven. That is, on the one side, as with the schools of Hillel and Shammai, and on the flip side, as with Nachshon leading the crossing of the Sea of Reeds. Yes, it’s not personal. Second, at present we’re caught between an army of bots and idols chasing us and the challenges of threading a new path through the unknown. Just waiting, ignoring it, or sitting on our hands won’t do.
Whosoever chooses to celebrate the sacred discussion in its community by assuming the leadership role community-wide will succeed and would then officially announce to the World the new era of the Cosmovision Age of Peace! Yes, the joy of leaving behind us polarization, discordance and sadness and opening the times of whole peace by way of illustrative example.
Limud Torah Bible Study (לימוד תורה) is the best spent hour of the week, 24/7!
After all is said and done, the choice is between theories on justice. Between, on the one hand, Justice/justice pursue: Just-State for Just-Society, and on the other hand, Social-justice pursue: negotiate concessions from an unjust state. It’s between more of the same beaten path, everything is off to a wrong start, or turn the page once and for all. Lead or follow as one more chapter of a failed national organization.
Things never change because those at the wheel want to repeat things which brought success in the past. It’s the classical status quo. No risk no gain. Just business as usual. No wonder so few faithful, never mind going to service. Understanding OSC is challenging, but not on account that it’s hard but rather unusual as in out of the routine and ordinary.
Perhaps a transitional solution might work without losing sight of the principle on account of so many issues. Something like the “53i+” Constitution in Justice/justice pursue: Just-State for Just-Society, in combination with the Issues of Social Justice.
Humanity lost its way along the path somewhere somehow too far in the past to leave a trace. The thing is that were it not for the residue of the OS attached to but a few originary civilizations we wouldn’t know any better. Return teshuvah (תְּשׁוּבָה) to the origin for a fresh new start. Today there’s much reliance on pharmaceuticals if not outright drugs, and if that wasn’t enough, we now have the threat of AI taking over our will.
The New School of thought is Justice/justice pursue: Just-State for Just-Society, in following the tradition as in Deut 16:20. The Old School of thought is Social-justice pursue, strive for trickle concessions from the unjust state. The Just-State is “53i+”. The Unjust-State is “31a-”. The Old School combated shadows of symptoms of injustice of a corrupt state, while the New School addresses the character of justice and the just state starts off on the right foot.
The tradition says Justice/justice pursue; it certainly doesn’t say Social-Justice pursue. This comes across as Just-State for Just-Society, and nowhere does it say Unjust-State for Social-Justice. That is, Justice/justice pursue is Justice-S / justice-DRP, Cultural-D Political-R Economical-P. Or more to the point, OS-S / Cosmovision-DRP, Cultural-D Political-R Economical-P.
The thing is that Social Justice is 2nd Derivative Greece or worse still as 3rd Derivative Europe. That is, Social-Justice is the NT’s interpretation of 1st Derivative OT’s Justice/justice. This is clearly manifest in “give to Cesar what is Cesar’s and to Gd what is Gd’s” as in the synoptic gospels. The thing is that everything is Gd’s and what is human should reflect Gd in image and likeness. The thing is that nowhere is humanity entitled to ownership of the earth, leaving the rest to heaven and the afterlife. It’s just another instance of mono-dualism of 2nd D Greece and downwards, as compared to 1st D Israel and upward to uni/triadism of the OS residue in the originary civilization of Mesoamerica. This subject will never be exhausted in discussion, no matter how many times it’s attempted. The OT as Originary Testament of the OSC is timeless before Creation and at the closest at Time = 0!
Previous OT as Old T fell in line with NT. Not so OT as Originary T, it leads! OT isn’t in theory what NT is in practice. They’re entirely different concepts as explained above. The problem with the Social Justice approach is that it doesn’t work. There are more poor people now than when this approach started decades ago. But that’s the good news, the bad news is the cause. The cause being NT’s misinterpretation of OT’s Justice/justice as Social justice.
Let’s refresh the facts in case it got lost in the shuffle. OT as OSC is Justice/justice pursue: Just-State for Just-Society. It partakes of the “53i+” project of a nation-state condition for the existence of a Just-Society. Not so NT of Social justice pursue: Unjust state for unjust society which accepts as given today’s “31a-” project of the nation state and simply tries to squeeze concessions out of a failed solution. It fixes the safety net to cushion the fall all the while increasing the distance between the haves and the have nots. In its own biased naive way, it serves to perpetuate the status quo if not to worsen it in the name of progress. It makes micro gains all the while making macro losses.
At the ground level of things, the problem with Social-justice as compared with Justice/justice is that it’s a capitulation to injustice for lack of a game plan to tackle the broken state of things. It’s like a coaching a fighter to pull the punches instead of putting its full weight behind them.
Social-justice is democratic socialism or at best social capitalism with both endorsing the “31a-” State instead of “53i+”. To put it in no uncertain terms, democratic socialism and social capitalism are the flip sides of the copper penny. There shouldn’t even be any need for a Social-justice safety net if things were only done right from the start with Justice/justice!
The theory of the OSC is comprehensive as broad is humanity, but as concerns justice, it’s narrows down as follows. The broad proposal addresses the cradle of the West as Greece-State, Israel-Church as well as the cradle of the World as Mesoamerica-Israel of the OSC of humanity. Briefly as in reviewing, Mesoamerica is inductive, creatively active, by song of discovery, while Israel is deductive, obedience, by prayer of revelation. Holistic theory and specific application.
The thing is that the Anusim are back and they’re not coming back empty-handed.
(G’d helps those who help themselves! ¡Ayúdate que te ayudaré!)
May the best present on CBI’s sesquicentennial anniversary be another cycle integrating by loop and hoop the olde- and neo-Ashkenazim and the olde- and neo-Sephardim communities. The year 2026 marks the 150th anniversary of the founding of Congregation Beth Israel (CBI) with thirty (30) members out of thirty-five (35) Jewish families then living in Austin, Texas. Its first president and vice-president being Henry Hirshfield, Ashkenazi, and Phineas de Córdoba, Sephardic, back in 1876, respectively. It has always been situated around midtown and since 1956 in its present central location on Shoal Creek Blvd and not in the Jewish Community Center (JCC) uptown westside, a fenced campus of sorts.
Our very own Board president started the Cause/movement with her audacious dream, her ideas and vision-building as in her inspired message to the congregation-at-large after the soul-searching retreat. She was right in identifying the neuralgic sweet spots. Standing out from her message is that CBI is more than a synagogue; creating a Jewish Renaissance in Austin; its spirit of learning, justice and joy; leadership model in sustainability and social action; togetherness of ancient Jewish wisdom and contemporary challenges; resilience after challenge; creating a sacred space; making Judaism relevant again; not distant dream but realizing it; we’re heading a movement to transform Jewishness in Austin; open to listening to congregants thoughts; the future starts now! Essentially, the goals are Jewish renaissance, making Judaism relevant again, and leadership by modeling. Quite a tall order, requiring deep-seated and comprehensive changes which don’t fit within the framework of today’s tradition stemming from the Enlightenment Age, requiring a new era in the Cosmovision Age of Peace!
Briefly, the consultant vision-builder set the stage, the Board president signaled the goals, and a member cosmovisionist added the means. All proportions kept, but this has the makings of a discussion for the sake of heaven. That is, on the one side, as with the schools of Hillel and Shammai, and on the flip side, as with Nachshon Free-spirited or Brave-one (נַחְשׁוֹן) leading the crossing of the Sea of Reeds, according to Rabbinic tradition. Yes, it’s not personal. Second, at present we’re caught between an army of bots and idols chasing us and the challenges of threading a new path through the unknown. Just waiting, ignoring it, or sitting on our hands won’t cut it anymore.
Whosoever chooses to celebrate the sacred discussion at CBI or elsewhere by assuming the leadership role community-wide will succeed and would then officially announce to the World the new era of the Cosmovision Age of Peace! Yes, the joy of leaving behind us polarization, discordance and sadness and opening the times of whole peace by way of illustrative example. Her flashing insight just happened to be right. The challenge now is to follow through the inspiration. It takes a spark to kindle a bonfire, but it takes someone to do it, other than lightning from the sky.
In a nutshell, the one whole of the Cosmovision Age of Peace in the Jewish triad of Renaissance, Relevance, and Leadership. The consultant set the stage, president posed the challenges and the cosmogonist provided the theory. That is, Renaissance from the cradle of the West to the cradle of the World. Relevance again from one West-&-Greece biased of mono-dualism, to the OSC of uni/triadism of Shalom Olam World Peace (שָׁלוֹם עוֹלָם). Leadership no longer followship with OT as Originary Testament and no longer as Old Testament of the NT New Testament. The valid archetype is now World cradle with Mesoamerica, Israel, Greece, World and no longer the West cradle of Israel, Greece, World.
And if one may be allowed to suggest, in order the get the discussion going, the proponent of the Originary Sign Cosmovision (OSC) can assume the protagonist role. The antagonist could be selected from a slate of rabbis who know kabbalah and regular ones, Jewish studies academics, anthropologists in Mesoamerica, Andean, and Native American Studies, with the congregants as public to ask questions. The moderator could be entrusted to the President-elect or notable. The consultant’s visioning outcome of the retreat, the President’s edifying message for the future of CBI, and the cosmovisionist member about CBI’s Ripple of Peace, would testify to give an account of their positions. Our make-do Sanctuary Auditorium would be an appropriate setting, with Brother and Sisterhood providing whatever the occasion requires.
It would seem to follow that if the condition of PaRaDi/Se compliance is the norm, then it surely is the case that it equally applies to the state, society, as to foot people. And it does such that if you get it right with the OSC you should improve with time. Contrariwise, if you don’t get it right by not OSC, then this would lead to what ails our society, such as polarization, violence, and intransigence, and in general to the downside of what’s good. While it may sound like a circular argument, there’s only one way of finding out. By dialogue of experimental research.
What we do know is that we’re presently under the reign of self-destruction, one way or another. And it’s happening here and now across all age groups of the societal spectrum. Everybody seems to be fundamentalist, originalist, relativist, and all are equally dogmatic. But that’s regarding society as a whole, now what about the foot individual person? By way of example, is dementia reversable? That I don’t know. Specific cures are beyond our hypothesis.
The theory is that what ails civilization is mono-dualism and the cure is uni/triadism. This is essentially the thesis of the Cosmovision Age of Peace. Like if you keep eating highly processed junk food you will get sick, and if instead you start eating whole foods you will recover and be healthy. In more abstract terms, the choice is between embracing the OSC of originary civilization over the ideology of the cradle of the West with its mono-dual rationalism.
And now that we mentioned it, let’s say something about reason. Internet. The original Greek term was “λόγος” logos, the root of the modern English word “logic”… As a philosophical term logos was translated in its non-linguistic senses in Latin as ratio… French raison is derived directly from Latin, and this is the direct source of the English word “reason”. From this word comes the sense of ratio in physics as a comparison of a part to the whole (example, (x/X=0.1), and by extension this has to do with analysis. We’ve gotten good at breaking the whole into parts to figure what it’s made of, but we’re bad at putting the parts back together again as a whole. That’s the drawback and cosmovision is charged to resolve it moving forward, not backwards to primitive times. Hence recovering the sense of cosmovision then and now, as in doing full circle.
The next question is when is the best time to start? The sooner the better! The longer we wait the greater the damage done to our organism. Perhaps it would be beneficial to focus it to a case study of sorts. In order to do just that would require setting the table to do the operation. As always, let’s start off with the PaRaDi/Se Principle as expressed in the generic as in the Model-H formula. Namely, Holy-S is-/-becomes Human-DRP, Heart-D Head-R Hands-P, or more to the point as Spiritual Inner-D Mental Interphase-R Physical Outer-P.
As we saw above explained, this generic formula expressing Uni-S/Triad-DRP breaks down or corrupts as Mono-S – Trio-DRP, with the Secret-S inaccessible and no longer part of the equation, and the remaining three transforming with hinge Mentalism-R into Spiritualism–D(R) and Physicalism–P(R). At the social level now as functionals of Mentalism-R these mutate unto Capitalism-D(R) and Socialism-P(R). The common expression is that “everything is in the mind”. Not that it is, but it will turn us into bots in so believing.
But going back one step down unto the individual level, the question is how does this Mentalism-R as Spiritualism–D(R) and Physicalism–P(R) translate with the foot person on the street? Well, socially this goes as Faith-D(R) and Business-P(R) networking. By the way, politically as generates polarization this goes over as Democratic-D(R) and Republican-P(R). But let’s continue with our quest as to how it affects the foot person walking next to us. I guess what I’m trying to nail down is whence dementia. And while we’re at it, whence queerness sexuality. Undoubtedly, some dementia and queerness is natural occurrence, just as much as sharpness and straightness, but what is the ratio? That I don’t know but can be investigated. The point is that we need to know how much is self-made, induced or contra natura, and how much occurs naturally.
This is especially relevant as the population of its society ages and from an early age our children are exposed to social media which may be confusing the issue. Our claim is that mono-dualism is the force driving losing our minds. Don’t knock it till you try it! Lucidity or dementia, your choice. Sexual certainty, your choice. Wisdom or madness, your choice. The thing is that they’re so widespread as is mono-dualism. This makes it the prime deep-seated causal suspect. This is the advantage of the approach of abstract principle over that of hand-placed issues.
Time is energy, you either invest it in the advent of the next generation or else splash it on yourself. Either way use it or lose it. This thing is comprised of theoretical and experimental research using OSC. For all the above the goal is to determine the distributions in pro natura and contra natura in us, or hardwired like DNA and softwared like ideology, respectively. Are the ratios too large, too small, or just right, allowing margins for error, in following standard scientific practice. Needless to say, there are many questions to be settled, details and fundamentals, and very delicate might I add, so we’d be well advised to refrain from opining.
I used to be critical of NT, till it dawned on me that NT is just the newer version of OT, as its name indicated of New-N over Old-T. What was implicit was simply made explicit, unequivocal. By Testament T is meant precisely the same as last will and testament, but now referring to YHVH Powers and humanity as a whole. Let’s explain, from the Torah.
And I will take you for Me as a people, and I will to you as Powers. And you shall know that I, YHVH, am your God who freed you from the labors of the Egyptians:
Comment: It’s an entanglement brought on by Elohim Powers on the People, referring to the Beney Yisrael Children of Israel. Though it’s enunciated as “a people” and “as Powers, it’s later stated the personal relationship meaning that the “a” turns into “the”, in both cases of people and Powers.
Jacob then made a vow, saying, “If God remains with me, protecting me on this journey that I am making, and giving me bread to eat and clothing to wear:
And I return safe to my father’s house— YHVH shall be my Elohim:
Comment: It seems that Jacob started this entanglement biconditional of his People and the Elohim.
Of course, the relationship of YHVH, note no mention made of Elohim, with Jacob was laid out previously through Abraham in Genesis 17:1-10 or so, including the name change from Abram to Abraham, and mention of circumcision. However, the point in the above isn’t about the covenant per se, but rather about exclusivity. That is, of members only conditional, when it should have been members-&-nonmembers only.
Now fast forward to the T’s of OT-&-NT to verify chip off the old block, or, as father as son. But now in the days of King religion is passed on from OT to NT, then implicit now explicitly. That is, from belonging to a people to belonging to a religion. Originally in times of cosmovision it may have been meant holistically what later was turned dualistic, as members & nonmembers. Salvation only comes from natural selection now to cultural selection. Both are shades of belief, distinctions which ultimately don’t amount to much difference.
Within the OT, suffice being part of the Children of Israel and obeying the commandments to be saved for the world to come. While the OT is uni/triad as Uni-S / Triad-DRP, Religion-D Civilization-R People-P, the NT is mono-dualism as Mono-S – Dual-DRP, Religion-D Faith-R Universality-P.
The NT takes off from the OT and in the process, both magnifies and diminishes, for better and for worse. On the one hand, through a people’s strict obedience to the commandments of the Law, and on the other hand, through blind faith on the word of the Messiah. There’s no other way but our way. That is, it magnifies the role of intermediacy of obedience to Law & faith on Messiah, all the while diminishes direct creativity of the agents. But this should come as no surprise, after all it’s true to monism-dualism becoming absolutism. For reference, recall that OSC endorses uni/triadism.
Let’s say more on the NT from its gospel. The following verses will suffice.
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life: John 3:16
Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me”: John 14:6
Comment: Solely the Messiah has the credentials to speak in the name of the Father God.
This goes to the crux of the meaning of holism as all-encompassing or wholesome. In Israel’s biblical times, “religion” was all-encompassing, just as much as in Greece’s classical times “philosophy” was all-encompassing. But this takes is to Modernity’s scenario with “science” all-encompassing. This only goes to show the by now truism of OS-S / Cosmovision-DRP, Religion-D Philosophy-R Science-P.
As a parting thought is the question of how to approach the Torah. Unless you start at the beginning of the beginning, you’ll end of taking sides. From the cradle of cradles, anything short of that will land you lopsided or taking sides either way. While there’s no proof of the OS, nor can there be of any ultimate cause, there is indirect proof by its effects. Otherwise, there’s no knowledge worth mentioning other than King Opinion of depending on whom you ask.
Unless you can visualize it, you’re not understanding it. Asking forgiveness for the following example, but how can one be sure there was a bomb explosion if there was no one witnessing it one way or another? It’s safe to conclude that it was a bomb fall, but not without direct proof, but proof it is because nothing else could have caused such damaging effects on the surroundings. Same as the alleged bomb explosion, for lack of a better example, there are two side effects of the OSC. These are present in Mesoamerica’s Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli (Flower Song / Life) and alternatively Ixtli Áyotl / Yoliztli (Face Heart / Life), as well as Israel’s Alef / BeReshIth A / InBeginningOf (א/בְּ-רֵאשִׁ֖-ית). The tricky part is unraveling the twists and turns of the spinning of human events.
That is, call it luck or stumbling unto the solution by accident, but the Action principle provides starting from 1st Derivative Israel of Medieval kabbalah of PaRDeS as formula of the Torah, backward to the Israel’s Primeval kabbalah, fast backward to Mesoamerica. The thing is to avoid the labyrinth of 2nd Derivative Greece, not to mention 3rd Derivative West and other later versions which introduce extraneous sources further obfuscating the matter. So only Israel’s primeval kabbalah of S/DRP and Mesoamerica’s PRD/S is the PaRaDi/Se principle of the OSC.
Thus, once accepting S/DRP as Israel’s kabbalah proper, then one can safely identify PRD/S as Mesoamerica’s residue of the OSC. Others don’t have what Israel’s theism and Mesoamerica’s humanism joint narrative seems to have.
The thing is that there’s no ultimate proof of what being in becoming is the case. Which is to say, what is the meaning of life, the purpose of living. Sex and success to reproduce and survive are certainly part of the equation, needless to say, but existence before, during, and afterlife is what matters ultimately. So, what likely proof can one come up with, beyond circular arguments of OT and NT? By proof is meant what guarantee is given. Just like the proof of the pudding is in the eating refrain. The proof in the eating is same here. The proof of the meaning must be in implementing the OSC of the PaRaDi/Se principle. How so? From the Internet we get that Pudding-S hunger-/-appetite Eating-DRP, Neurological signals-D Psychological factors-R Physiological digestion-P.
If you’re a school teacher or college professor, pastor or priest, and master your specific subject matter, then this question is for you. “What is the Universal Principle of Knowledge?” If you don’t know the answer, or consider the question nonsensical, then this essay is for you. Please don’t embarrass your peers, friends and family. After all, that’s the meaning underlying the very name of University as uni-verse. It isn’t nonsense because if all university subjects have principles, then certainly there’s a universal principle encompassing them all. Spoiler alert. The UPK is the PaRaDi/Se principle of the Originary Sign Cosmovision (OSC).
Today’s world is one of fractvision of the Standard Model of Knowledge (SMK) over the cosmovision of the PaRaDi/Se principle of the OSC. By the SMK is meant established canon. It is so deep-rooted in Academia to the degree that it’s simply unquestionable. Taboo. Meaning that the divisions of the university into colleges and schools is how it unfolds. Nothing more to it. It doesn’t need to make sense, suffices that it smothers any attempt at trying to make sense of it all. And since it’s the self-appointed authority, who else has standing to disbelieve it? It’s essentially no different from the pitfalls of the OT and the NT. Circular arguments in 3D.
Today’s fractvision is characterized by many principles, a set for each subject area of study of knowledge. Much like the nation states as sovereign entities. This fractvision is not restricted to academic knowledge but as seen above arises all across the board of human endeavor. And why so? Well because it goes to the very cornerstone of the social edifice. All areas of knowledge fall under the umbrella of the University. Way before universities as places of learning appeared on stage. It all stems from an originary beginning. The problem is that this originary beginning was muddled in the shuffle and scuffle.
This is where our postulate of the Originary Sign Cosmovision of the PaRaDi/Se principle comes to the fore to bring order unto chaos. Would the requesting question be characterized as fractvision, dualistic, or cosmovision, holistic? This is the Catch-22 situation all over again. Would the nature of the question be fractvision as religious, philosophical, or scientific, or cosmovision as the PaRaDi/Se principle? The situation is between protagonist and antagonist positions. Obviously, the matter won’t be decided by the contending parties, but by the jury of the people, much like in a court of law.
Spoiler alert. What is the whole of the UPK as beginning of things? Due to its primacy, the question must include the answer. Or else in the question must be the answer, which is to say that in the quest must be the grail. The question of “What is the UPK” can be presented in full formulaic format as Who-S why-/-because How-DRP, When-D Where-R What-P.
From the Internet the etymology of the word “universe” comes from the Latin universum, meaning “all things, the whole”, combining unus (“one”) and versus (the past participle of vertere, “to turn”), literally meaning “turned into one” or “all together” vertere, “to turn”), literally meaning “turned into one” or “all together”. It entered Old French in the 12th century and English by the 1580s to describe the totality of existing things, reflecting the concept of all components rolled into a single, unified whole. This we update as Uni-S / Verse-DRP, Timewise-D Spacewise-R Masswise-P. That is, Who Uni-S why-/-because How Verse-DRP, When time-D Where space-R What mass-P.
What is the Universal Principle of Knowledge? Segue to Originary Sign Cosmovision.
If you’re a school teacher or college professor, pastor or priest, and master your specific subject matter, then the general question of What is the Universal Principle of Knowledge is meant for you.
You should know it, confess you disregard it, or else don’t know what it is. After all, the meaning underlying the name of University as uni-verse is “turning into one” as in Uni-S / Verse-DRP of the PaRaDi/Se formula. It makes perfect sense since all knowledge subjects taught in academia have principles, then certainly there’s a universal principle underlying them all. Spoiler alert. The Universal Principle of Knowledge (UPK) is the PaRaDi/Se beginning of the Originary Sign Cosmovision (OSC).
The University is a relic in name not in fact. Today people prefer concrete solutions to concrete problems. Analysis provides the toolbox.
So, let’s take it from the top and work our way downwards. Let’s not throw the baby out with the bathwater. The universal principle of knowledge is the same as the universal beginning of knowledge. This takes us to the cradle of cradles of humanity in the form of the Postulate of the Originary Sign Cosmovision and the resulting OSC residue in the originary civilizations. The virtue of this cornerstone assumption lies in laying the conceptual framework as well as opening the field of applications of the theory.
What this means in practice is placing the advent of humanity proper in an epoch after that of hunter-gathering and before civilization. The character of this Age of Anarchy is nothing other than the OSC which thePaRaDi/Se formulaprovides. This OS Cosmovision refers to the view of anarchy as self-rule over the fractvision relationship of ruler-ruled of civilization. Cosmovision-S is holistic-/-dualistic, understood as today’s Civilization-DRP, broken into theology-D philosophy-R science-P.
The timeline unravelling the riddle between the originary civilizations was a back-&-forth movement, on the one hand, between 1st Derivative Israel made out of Mesopotamia and Egypt consisting of the twice removed OSC residue of Alef/BeReshIth A/InBeginningOf (א/בְּ-רֵאשִׁ֖-ית) as A-S / In-D Beginning-R Of-P, and on the other hand, of the OSC residue of Mesoamerica with Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli Flower Song / Life as Flower-P (_)-R Song-D / Life-S. The point is that without the OSC residue of Mesoamerica, Israel’s twice removed OSC residue 1st Derivative Alef/BeReshIth wouldn’t have been authenticated. Likewise, without Israel’s twice removed Alef/BeReshIth OSC residue, Mesoamerica’s OSC residue of Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli wouldn’t have been identified. QED
Now that we finally got it right, the challenge moving forward is adjusting social institutions to comply with the PaRaDi/Se formula. Essentially, the trick to the Kabbayotlogy Margarita cocktail is Israel’s primeval kabbalah, Mesoamerica’s Toltecáyotl, and Greece’s logos.
By way of wrapping things up. The Originary Sign Cosmovision aims to be the theory of everything. The all-encompassing approach fell out of use due to not finding a good handle on linking the mesh. Now bite-size strict analysis imperative.
The Theory of Everything.
The Originary Sign Cosmovision is due to the following triad. It took a relative in-&-outsider to recover the overt in the covert. That I’m aware there aren’t other attempts.
The first breakthrough was crystalline primeval kabbalah distancing it from murky Medieval kabbalah. This was Alef/BeReshIth A/InBeginningOf (א/בְּ-רֵאשִׁ֖-ית) of A-S / In-D Beginning-R Of-P in Genesis 1:1a/Alef, as God/obedience.
The second was complementary in finding the abstract formula of primeval kabbalah in Mesoamerica. This was Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli (Flower Song / Life) or Ixtli Áyotl / Yoliztli (Face Heart / Life) of Xóchitl–P (_)-RCuícatl–D / Yoliztli–S, as creativity/Life.
The third breakthrough by added measure was the Originary Sign Cosmovision Postulate of the Epoch of Anarchy, between hunter gathering and civilization. This would then correspond to the OSC residue in Mesoamerica and twice removed in Israel. The anarchy epoch of self-rule is distinguished from the other-rule of civilization. Civilization shattered the whole/triad of anarchy unto wholeless-threesomes of things.
In the scheme of things of the OSC Postulate, Mesoamerica has the OSC residue, Israel is 1st Derivative out of Egypt and Mesopotamia, with Greece 2nd Derivative as the cradle of the West, and unfortunately of the World.
In this messed up world, the scapegoat is Israel, and the sacrificial goat is Mesoamerica.
What is the universal principle of knowledge?
The “what” question gets the “where” answer. From today to the six (6) originary civilizations of Egypt, Mesopotamia, India, China, Andean, and Mesoamerica.
To make things manageable without losing generality, we’ll fuse Mesopotamia & Egypt into 1st Derivative Israel, retain Mesoamerica, and put on hold India, China, and Andean.
Postulate the Originary Sign Cosmovision (OSC) somewhere in the Anarchy Epoch of self-rule, between cave dwelling hunter gathering and civilization proper of other-rule. While there’s no direct evidence of the OSC, there is OSC residue in the originary civilization of Mesoamerica, as well as in the twice removed OSC residue in 1st Derivative Israel.
The thing is that without Mesoamerica’s residue of the OS, Israel’s twice removed residuewouldn’t have been authenticated. Likewise, without Israel’s twice removed OSC residue, Mesoamerica’s OSC residue wouldn’t have been identified.
The breakthrough came with Israel’s primeval kabbalah of the PaRaDi/Se formula catching the essence of anarchy.Cryptically, it’s Sod Secret (סוֹד)-S covert being-/-overt becoming Derash Discover (דְּרַשׁ)-DRemez Remit (רֶמֶז)-RPeshat Plain (פְּשָׁט)-P.
This formula appears expressed in Genesis 1:1a/Alef as Alef/BeReshIth A/InBeginningOf (א/בְּ-רֵאשִׁ֖-ית) S/DRP, with A-S / In-D Beginning-R Of-P. Later, it appears in the Toltecáyotl of Mesoamerica as Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli Flower Song / Life of Flower-P (_)-R Song-D / Life-S. Israel’s is S/DRP of God/obedience, while Mesoamerica’s is PRD/Sof creativity/Life.
So much for the theory, now to the applications. The norm is simply that all knowledge must be PaRaDi/Se compliant. Let’s take by way of example the model of the state as it comes from the Enlightenment period. It’s expressed as “31a-”, consisting of 3-powers, 1-vote per person, a-adult suffrage, and minus indicating negative incline moving forward. To make it PaRaDi/Se compliant turns it into the “53i+” model of the state. It goes from “3” to “5” powers, with the addition of the 4th power Media and 5th power University, as sides of the 3rd power Judicial, conserving the 1st power Legislative and 2nd power Executive. And goes from “1” to “3” votes per person due to the human triad consisting of beliefs, values, and interests. And goes from “a” of adult suffrage to “i” of infant suffrage under parental tutorage. And goes from “-” negative to “+” positive inclination improving democracy.
Now within the applications let’s narrow it down to case studies of Israel and Mexico. Starting with Israel Palestine, is it a one state or two state solution? Neither one nor two but triad by changing the state from the “31a-” Enlightenment state model to the “53i+” Cosmovision model of the state. Next in line with Mexico to found Mexican humanism of the 4T Morena Party with the Originary Sign Cosmovision of Mesoamerica’s humanism and Israel’s theism.
Synagogue Building: Sanctuary for worship, Commons for socializing, & “Toltec” for creativity.
Dear Prez:
By writing your inspired Message after the Board retreat last summer 2025, you inadvertently started a century old overdue revision of Judaism after Kaplan’s 1932 “Judaism as a civilization” and previously during the birth of the Reform movement in Germany in the 1820’s kindled by the Enlightenment and Emancipation. Your modesty shouldn’t make you shy away from the charge of leading your initiated ripple movement far and wide. You’re not alone, start by sharing the Message to kindle conversation that foot congregants will listen if you put your heart in the calling. Just in case you’ve fallen behind with the reading, please consult the website at paradisism.com to fill in the details. I’ll assume familiarity and focus solely on conclusions. The argument is global humankind based on the Six Originary Civilizations dating from 10-4K years ago, focused on Mesoamerica 4K and Israel 3K.
The fact on the ground in Austin is that out of a Jewish population of 30K, scarcely 20% ever touch homebase. Based on the postulate of the Originary Sign Cosmovision, the two mirror readings of primeval kabbalah as PaRaDi/Se are Israel’s S/DRP of God/obedience and Mesoamerica’s PRD/S of creativity/Life. Israel’s is found in Genesis 1:1a/Alef as Alef / BeReshIth A / InBeginningOf (א/בְּ-רֵאשִׁ֖-ית), whereas Mesoamerica’s is Xóchitl Cuícatl / Yoliztli (Flower Song / Life). Both have raison d’être rooted in the Torah. There’s no need to insist on the former, whereas the latter is based on humanity being made in the image and likeness of the Creator. Thus, Creator-S of creative-/-creature of Creation-DRPcan be read with humanity as creative of life. The question is how to harmonize self-rule humanism of creativity/ Life of Mesoamerica with other-rule theism of God/worship of Israel.
So much for the theory, now to the applications. Israel is a triad of religion, peoplehood, and civilization. The synagogue as hub of Jewish community should be Big Tent equally housing the former present God/worship 20% as well as the latter absent creative/Life 80%. This means that the building projected should consist of an ethereal Sanctuary for the 20% as well as a hands-on “Studio” for the 80%. This “Studio” or “Shop” or “Toltec” which means artisan in Nahuatl is understood as a workspace of the arts, including meditation, and anything else conducive to creative expression and combating AI, depression and addictions. The Sanctuary and the Toltec should be next to each other, aside from the Commons area. The fact that the 80% aren’t presently assisting is no excuse not to take them into account. They don’t assist precisely because they’re not represented and don’t feel they belong here. It’s a Catch-22 situation. Thus, the need for viewing Reform Judaism as continuously reforming to meet ever-changing challenges and opportunities and not as a one-off every century or so.
Furthermore, the synagogue building needs to be PaRaDi/Se complaint to align with the Torah. Succinctly, Synagogue-S covert-/-overt Building-DRP, Sanctuary-D Toltec-R Commons-P. In ordinary parlance, the failure of the synagogue layout to comply with the PaRaDi/Se triad condition is causal of the breakup of the community into theist worshipers and humanist creatives. Within the Originary Sign, theism and humanism aren’t mutually exclusive, rather complementary flipsides of the same coin, and joined at the rim by cosmovision. We have only ourselves to blame for the self-inflicted wound of disharmony, but likewise, it’s never too late to deliver the good of being light unto the nations of the world.
Triads (The preSocratic origins of dialogical science) (2012)
Tríadas (Los orígenes presocráticos de la ciencia dialógica) (2012)
Socratic period:
Friends of Dialogue (The quest of keeping the heart, a philosophy of practice) (2005)
Amigos del diálogo (La búsqueda de cuidar el corazón, una filosofía de la práctica) (2005)
Dialogue of Friends (Making sense of the human spirit, a practice of philosophy) (2005)
Diálogo de amigos (Haciendo sentido del espíritu humano, una práctica de la filosofía) (2005)
~
Recommendation: When viewing the books at Amazon, to get a sense of them, please view the Description, the Front & Back covers, and the Sample Read of the written formats.
View this document at Shalom Olam Site www.paradisism.com. Also visit the vintage site www.paradisism.org.
Recruting leaders for the Cause/movement! Please apply if you hear a callling to usher in good anarchy of the Age of Joy and out bad anarchy of today’s Postmodernity.
The storyline is about the strategic plan arising from an envisioning retreat of the Board of Congregation Beth Israel (CBI). The consultant Fayruz marks the tone by highlighting the bottom line as a mixture of audacious dreaming, clear transformation themes, and infectious enthusiasm. The president of the Board Corrie articulates the ends in her message for the future. She highlights the audacious dream of creating a Jewish renaissance as consisting of a spiritual ecosystem that radiates outward consisting of environmental and social justice leadership, multigenerational learning and growth. That what makes this vision possible is that CBI has learned to navigate change while staying true, all the while creating a space that feels magical by making Judaism relevant again. That it’s exciting because this vision is already beginning and the work ahead is inspiring. Moreover, that the city of Austin is ready for these changes, that kehillah means more than membership to a synagogue. That the voice and vision of each member matters, that in the present the future starts in the past. Lastly, given that the Fayruz’ tone and Corrie’s ends are a tall order by any measure, Ric a foot member provides a corresponding cosmovision as the means to achieve success of the trailblazing strategic plan.
If in your opinion, the sketch of a strategic plan makes no sense, then trash it and continue living in our present state of bad anarchy of postmodernity, ravism and prayer. But if the argument makes all the sense in the world, then let’s turn the page and inaugurate the Age of Joy of good anarchy and start the Cause/movement of the Originary Sign (OS). The endorsed approach is not dualism’s critical analysis of the political problem with no clue of solution, other than placing things by gloved hand out of the head and beating heart, but rather derives from principle linked to the OS. Recall that democracy comes from 2nd Derivative Greece later naturalized by 3rd Derivative West into the wildcard that we have today. So then, what is this good anarchy of the OS? But before we get to the applications, let’s display the cosmovision upfront.
The schematics of the OS layout is as follows. The Originary Sign (OS) hypothesis is that there’s a point/origin marking the advent of humanity from whatever was previously the case. Good anarchy as still wholly guided by the OS would then be posited between the stage of hunter-gathering and originary civilization proper when the triad sharded into three separate pieces as of this morning. There were six (6) originary civilizations, but for convenience without loss of generality we’ll put on hold China, India, and Andean and consider solely Mesopotamia, Egypt together, and Mesoamerica quite apart.
There’s the 1st (first) Derivative of Israel out of Mesopotamia and Egypt. It is the primeval kabbalah consisting of the first letter of Hebrew Alef A (א) and the first word of Genesis BeReshIth InBeginningOf (בְּ-רֵאשִׁ֖-ית), to make Alef/BeReshIth A/InBeginningOf (א/בְּ-רֵאשִׁ֖-ית). In formulaic presentation Moses’ New School primeval kabbalah is PaRaDi/Se. This is not to be confused with Moisés de León’s Old School medieval kabbalah ofPaRDeS. Essentially, it’s Alef–S / Be–DResh–RIth–P(A-S / In-D Beginning-R Of-P), with the slash-/ as S holy-/-profane DRP, as S/DRP. Neatly, the OS as the Universal Principle of Knowledge is “theone whole is and becomes triad parts”, or else in acronym formula as PaRaDi/Se.
It’s mentioned first though Israel came after Mesoamerica because solely thanks to it can one identify the cue of the residue of the OS. The residue of the OS is detected in the Toltecáyotl of Nahuatl Mesoamerica in the difrasism Xóchitl Cuícatl (Flower Song), or else in Ixtli Áyotl (Face Heart). Only then does the evidence become apparent that in the difrasism Xóchitl Cuícatl (Flower Song) we have Xóchitl-P Cuícatl-D, or else Ixtli-P Áyotl-D(Face Heart).The sequence is P_D, R, /, S, to become PRD/S. On the other hand, Moses understood it deductively as S/DRP, Elohim-S covert-/-overt Humanity-DRP, Spiritual-D Mental-R Physical-P. This inductive Nahuatl Toltecáyotl PRD/S contrasts as its mirror image to the deductive Hebrew kabbalah S/DRP.
Now to the applications. The six-hundred thirteen (613) commandments of the obedience tradition can be reduced to the One (1) Commandment. Doing the gematria math 613 => 6+1+3 = 10 => 1+0 = 1! The One (1) commandment is to be creative, as YHVH is Creator. It debunks the convoluted one of “obey and pray” and inaugurates simply “be creative”.
Now the comparative. Theism as S/DRP and humanism as PRD/S. Or else Theism/Humanism of S/DRP, or as Humanism/Theism PRD/S. But S/DRP is teaching and PRD/S is learning. Mexoamerica’s humanism and Israel’s theism. The status of Israel is once removed from the residue of OS of Mesoamerica.
Now the takeaways. From Age of Enlightenment to Age of Joy. As standard model from Mono-dualism unto Uni/triadism. The acid test of making sense is the PaRaDi/Se standard. That is, everything that is the case is PaRaDi/Se compliant.
Justice, politics, and the state. At present we have the “31a-” Enlightenment Constitution composed of a 3-power state, 1 vote per person, adult suffrage, and minus (-) all others which diminishes democracy unto duocracy. Making the state PaRaDi/Se compliant, would give us the “53i+” Constitution. This is composed of a 5-power state and 3 votes per person, of infant suffrage, the “plus (+)” comes from enhancing democracy by placing the running of the budget under the University 5th power and elections under the Media 4th power. Social justice tries to obtain concessions by a gloved hand from an otherwise unfair state. Just society derives naturally from a just state.
